• Skip to main content
  • Skip to header right navigation
  • Skip to site footer

Log in
www.sages.org

SAGES

Reimagining surgical care for a healthier world

  • Home
    • SAGES Home
    • SAGES Foundation Home
  • About
    • Awards
    • Who Is SAGES?
    • Leadership
    • Our Mission
    • Advocacy
    • Committees
      • SAGES Board of Governors
      • Officers and Representatives of the Society
      • Committee Chairs and Co-Chairs
      • Committee Rosters
      • SAGES Past Presidents
    • Why Should You Support SAGES?
    • SAGES Swag
  • Meetings
    • SAGES NBT Innovation Weekend
    • SAGES Annual Meeting
      • 2026 Annual Meeting
      • 2027 Scientific Session Call for Abstracts
      • 2027 Emerging Technology Call for Abstracts
    • CME Claim Form
    • SAGES Past, Present, Future, and Related Meeting Information
    • SAGES Related Meetings & Events Calendar
  • Join SAGES!
    • Membership Application
    • Membership Benefits
    • Membership Types
      • Requirements and Applications for Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Affiliate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Associate Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Candidate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for International Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements for Medical Student Membership
    • Member Spotlight
    • Give the Gift of SAGES Membership
  • Patients
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Healthy Sooner – Patient Information for Minimally Invasive Surgery
    • Choosing Wisely – An Initiative of the ABIM Foundation
    • All in the Recovery: Colorectal Cancer Alliance
    • Find A SAGES Surgeon
  • Publications
    • Clinical / Practice / Training Guidelines, Statements, and Standards of Practice
    • Sustainability in Surgical Practice
    • SAGES Stories Podcast
    • SAGES Lead Up Podcast
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Patient Information From SAGES
    • TAVAC – Technology and Value Assessments
    • Surgical Endoscopy and Other Journal Information
    • Innovative Surgical Trends
    • SAGES Manuals
    • MesSAGES – The SAGES Newsletter
    • COVID-19 Archive
    • Troubleshooting Guides
  • Education
    • Wellness Resources – You Are Not Alone
    • Avoid Opiates After Surgery
    • SAGES Subscription Catalog
    • SAGES TV: Home of SAGES Surgical Videos
    • The SAGES Safe Cholecystectomy Program
    • Masters Program
    • Resident and Fellow Opportunities
      • MIS Fellows Course
      • SAGES Robotics Residents and Fellows Courses
      • SAGES Free Resident Webinar Series
      • Advanced Laparoscopy and Fluorescence-Guided Surgery Course for Fellows
      • Fellows’ Career Development Course
    • SAGES S.M.A.R.T. Enhanced Recovery Program
    • SAGES @ Cine-Med Products
      • SAGES Top 21 Minimally Invasive Procedures Every Practicing Surgeon Should Know
      • SAGES Pearls Step-by-Step
      • SAGES Flexible Endoscopy 101
    • SAGES OR SAFETY Video Activity
    • Foregut Video Atlas
  • Opportunities
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Fellowship Recognition Opportunities
    • SAGES Advanced Flexible Endoscopy Area of Concentrated Training (ACT) SEAL
    • Multi-Society Foregut Fellowship Certification
    • Research Opportunities
    • FLS
    • FES
    • FUSE
    • Jobs Board
    • SAGES Go Global: Global Affairs
  • Learning Hub
You are here: Home / Abstracts / Impact of Health Insurance on Complicated Choledocholithiasis and Same-Admission Interventions

Impact of Health Insurance on Complicated Choledocholithiasis and Same-Admission Interventions

Background: Disparities in management and outcomes of biliary disease have been linked to sources of payment for healthcare services. The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of insurance status on the cumulative incidence of inpatient admission for complicated choledocholithiasis (CMPCDL) and the proportion of patients who underwent a related intervention during that admission.
Methods: Patients with a discharge diagnosis of choledocholithiaisis (CDL) were identified from the 2006 Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS). Underinsured patients were compared to those adequately insured for the primary outcome measure of developing CMPCDL. Underinsured patients were defined as those patients with Medicaid or no insurance. CMPCDL included patients who developed cholangitis or acute pancreatitis during their admission for CDL. Patient demographics and comorbidities were compared using univariate and adjusted analyses. Secondary outcome measures of inpatient length of stay and performance of an intervention (endoscopic, surgical, or percutaneous) were evaluated.
Results: In 2006, we identified 114,531 discharges with a diagnosis of CDL. Mean age for the insured group was 63.6 ± 0.3 years (mean ± SE), with 62% female. For the underinsured, mean age was 38.6 ± 0.4, with 79% female. Several comorbid conditions were more prevalent in the insured group, including congestive heart failure, diabetes, hypertension, and renal failure. Alcohol abuse and obesity were more prevalent in the underinsured group. The overall incidence of CDL was 287 per 100,000 NIS discharges. Thirty-nine percent of CDL discharges were for CMPCDL (acute pancreatitis 73%, cholangitis 27%). In the age group 25-35 years, underinsured patients were 1.2 times more likely to have CMPCDL (95% CI 1.1-1.3). On multivariate analysis, risk factors for CMPCDL included age > 35 years (OR range 1.2-1.6, 95% CI range 1.0-1.9), male gender (OR 1.2, 95% CI 1.1-1.2), alcohol abuse (OR 1.4, 95% CI 1.2-1.7), hypertension (OR 1.1, 95% CI 1.0-1.2), and non-elective admission (OR 2.1, 95% CI 1.9-2.4). Patients of African American, Hispanic, and Asian race were more likely than Caucasians to have CMPCDL. Patients with CMPCDL were 1.5 times more likely to die (95% CI 1.2-1.8). Insured patients were more likely to receive an intervention for CDL during the same admission (OR 1.1, 95% CI 1.0-1.1). Patients who received an intervention were less likely to die than patients who did not receive an intervention (OR 0.43, 95% CI 0.34-0.53). Underinsured patients ages 25-65 years had significantly longer hospital stays, ranging from an additional 0.5-1.7 days (p<0.05).
Conclusions: Health insurance status, emergent admission need, and race had a significant impact on the development of CMPCDL. Underinsured patients were consistently at higher risk of developing CMPCDL with increased length of stay while insured patients were more likely to receive an intervention for CDL. An increased odds of death was observed for those patients who developed CMPCDL and for patients who did not undergo intervention for CDL.


Session: Poster

Program Number: P419

View Poster

Related



Hours & Info

15821 Ventura Blvd Ste 400
Encino, CA 91436

1-310-437-0544

[email protected]

Monday – Friday
8am to 5pm Pacific Time

Find Us Around the Web!

  • Bluesky
  • X
  • Instagram
  • Facebook
  • YouTube

Copyright © 2026 · SAGES · All Rights Reserved

Important Links

Healthy Sooner: Patient Information

SAGES Guidelines, Statements, & Standards of Practice

SAGES Manuals

Refine Search