• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

SAGES

Reimagining surgical care for a healthier world

  • Home
    • COVID-19 Annoucements
    • Search
    • SAGES Home
    • SAGES Foundation Home
  • About
    • Who is SAGES?
    • SAGES Mission Statement
    • Advocacy
    • Strategic Plan, 2020-2023
    • Committees
      • Request to Join a SAGES Committee
      • SAGES Board of Governors
      • Officers and Representatives of the Society
      • Committee Chairs and Co-Chairs
      • Full Committee Rosters
      • SAGES Past Presidents
    • Donate to the SAGES Foundation
    • Awards
      • George Berci Award
      • Pioneer in Surgical Endoscopy
      • Excellence In Clinical Care
      • International Ambassador
      • IRCAD Visiting Fellowship
      • Social Justice and Health Equity
      • Excellence in Community Surgery
      • Distinguished Service
      • Early Career Researcher
      • Researcher in Training
      • Jeff Ponsky Master Educator
      • Excellence in Medical Leadership
      • Barbara Berci Memorial Award
      • Brandeis Scholarship
      • Advocacy Summit
      • RAFT Annual Meeting Abstract Contest and Awards
  • Meetings
    • NBT Innovation Weekend
    • SAGES Annual Meeting
      • 2023 Scientific Session Call For Abstracts
      • 2023 Emerging Technology Call For Abstracts
    • CME Claim Form
    • Industry
      • Advertising Opportunities
      • Exhibit Opportunities
      • Sponsorship Opportunities
    • Future Meetings
    • Past Meetings
      • SAGES 2022
      • SAGES 2021
    • Related Meetings Calendar
  • Join SAGES!
    • Membership Benefits
    • Membership Applications
      • Active Membership
      • Affiliate Membership
      • Associate Active Membership
      • Candidate Membership
      • International Membership
      • Medical Student Membership
    • Member News
      • Member Spotlight
      • Give the Gift of SAGES Membership
  • Patients
    • Healthy Sooner – Patient Information for Minimally Invasive Surgery
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Choosing Wisely – An Initiative of the ABIM Foundation
    • All in the Recovery: Colorectal Cancer Alliance
    • Find a SAGES Member
  • Publications
    • SAGES Stories Podcast
    • SAGES Clinical / Practice / Training Guidelines, Statements, and Standards of Practice
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • TAVAC – Technology and Value Assessments
    • Surgical Endoscopy and Other Journal Information
    • SAGES Manuals
    • SCOPE – The SAGES Newsletter
    • COVID-19 Annoucements
    • Troubleshooting Guides
  • Education
    • OpiVoid.org
    • SAGES.TV Video Library
    • Safe Cholecystectomy Program
      • Safe Cholecystectomy Didactic Modules
    • Masters Program
      • SAGES Facebook Program Collaboratives
      • Acute Care Surgery
      • Bariatric
      • Biliary
      • Colorectal
      • Flexible Endoscopy (upper or lower)
      • Foregut
      • Hernia
      • Robotics
    • Educational Opportunities
    • HPB/Solid Organ Program
    • Courses for Residents
      • Advanced Courses
      • Basic Courses
    • Video Based Assessments (VBA)
    • Robotics Fellows Course
    • MIS Fellows Course
    • Facebook Livestreams
    • Free Webinars For Residents
    • SMART Enhanced Recovery Program
    • SAGES OR SAFETY Video
    • SAGES at Cine-Med
      • SAGES Top 21 MIS Procedures
      • SAGES Pearls
      • SAGES Flexible Endoscopy 101
      • SAGES Tips & Tricks of the Top 21
  • Opportunities
    • NEW-Area of Concentrated Training Seal (ACT)-Advanced Flexible Endoscopy-Coming Soon!
    • SAGES Fellowship Certification for Advanced GI MIS and Comprehensive Flexible Endoscopy
    • Multi-Society Foregut Fellowship Certification
    • SAGES Research Opportunities
    • Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery
    • Fundamentals of Endoscopic Surgery
    • Fundamental Use of Surgical Energy
    • Job Board
    • SAGES Go Global: Global Affairs and Humanitarian Efforts
  • Search
    • Search All SAGES Content
    • Search SAGES Guidelines
    • Search the Video Library
    • Search the Image Library
    • Search the Abstracts Archive
  • Store
    • “Unofficial” Logo Products
  • Log In

Identification of Patient Subgroups Associated with Unfavorable Long-term Outcome in the Laparoscopic Surgery for Colon Cancer Compared with Open Surgery: Subanalysis of a RCT Comparing Open and Laparoscopic Surgery for Colon Cancer (jcog0404)

Shuji Saito, MD1, Masafumi Inomata, MD2, Hiroshi Katayama, MD3, Masashi Wakabayashi3, Tomonori Akagi, MD2, Kentaro Nakajima, MD2, Seiichiro Yamamoto, MD4, Masaaki Ito, MD5, Yusuke Kinugasa, MD1, Shoichi Fujii, MD6, Fumio Konishi, MD7, Yoshihisa Saida, MD8, Masahiko Watanabe, MD9, Yasuhiro Shimada, MD10, Yoshihiro Moriya, MD4, Seigo Kitano, MD2. 1Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Shizuoka Cancer Center Hospital, 2Department of Gastroenterological and Pediatric Surgery, Oita University Faculty of Medicine, 3JCOG Data Center/Operations Office, National Cancer Center, 4Division of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5Division of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital East, 6Department of Surgery, Gastroenterological Centre, Yokohama City University, 7Department of Surgery, Jichi Medical University Saitama Medical Center, 8Departments of Surgery, Toho University Ohashi Medical Center, 9Department of Surgery, Kitasato University Hospital, 10Gastrointestinal Oncology Division, National Cancer Center Hospital

INTRODUCTION: Previously we reported that the long-term survivals in open surgery (OP) and laparoscopic surgery (LAP) were almost identical from the randomized controlled trial of Japan Clinical Oncology Group (JCOG0404) for stage II/III colon cancer patients, but long-term survival was unfavorable in the subgroup such as rectosigmoid colon, cT4, cN2 and high BMI of LAP arm (ASCO-GI 2015 #656). The purpose of the present study is to identify postoperative factors associated with poor long term survival in the LAP arm compared with the OP arm after adjusting clinical and pathological factors excluding the patients with pathological stage IV and R2 resection.

METHODS AND PROCEDURES: Eligibility criteria in JCOG0404 included patients aged 20–75, tumor located in the cecum, ascending, sigmoid, or rectosigmoid colon; clinical T3 or deeper lesion without involvement of other organs, clinical N0-2 and M0. Additionally in this analysis, the patients with pathological stage IV and R2 resection were excluded. Relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) from surgery were assessed using the multivariate Cox regression model adjusted by the clinical and pathological factors of which p value was smaller than 0.3 in Fisher's exact test.

RESULTS: Between Oct 2004 and Mar 2009, 1057 patients were randomized (OP 528, LAP 529), among whom 1025 patients (OP 511, LAP 514) were included in the current analysis. The adjusted HR (95% CI) of important clinicopathological factors in OS is shown in the table.

CONCLUSIONS: The subgroup analysis suggests that pT4, pN2, high BMI were factors associated with unfavorable long- term outcome of laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer with curative resection, but tumor located in RS was not associated. LAP might not be recommended for patients with high BMI and careful postoperative follow-up is recommended for patients with pT4 and pN2.

Table: Adjusted HR (95%CI) with OS

Factors
(N of OP, N of LAP)
Adjusted by clinical factors Adjusted by clinicopathological factors
BMI ≥ 25
(OP 121, LAP 133)

3.80
(1.40-10.26)

3.37
(1.24-9.19)
RS
(OP 136, LAP 119)

1.33
(0.64-2.76)

0.98
(0.46-2.09)
pT4
(OP 87, LAP 92)
1.29
(0.71-2.35)

1.33
(0.73-2.41)

pN1
(OP 144, LAP 167)

0.79
(0.43-1.45)

0.79
(0.43-1.45)

pN2
(OP 58, LAP 65)
1.74
(0.76-3.97)
1.74
(0.76-3.97)

Presented at the SAGES 2017 Annual Meeting in Houston, TX.

Abstract ID: 78994

Program Number: P187

Presentation Session: Poster (Non CME)

Presentation Type: Poster

152

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Pinterest
  • WhatsApp
  • Reddit

Related

« Return to SAGES 2017 abstract archive

Our Mission

Innovate, educate and collaborate to improve patient care.

Recently, on SAGES…

Critical View of Safety (CVS) Challenge QR Code

The SAGES Critical View of Safety Challenge – Donate Your Lap Chole Videos!

The Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons is hosting the first Artificial Intelligence Data Challenge conducted by surgeons. The aim of this challenge is to generate a large and diverse dataset of laparoscopic cholecystectomy videos, annotated with respect to the subcomponents of the Critical View of Safety (CVS). Computer scientists from all over the […]

Respuesta de SAGES al Estudio NordICC sobre el beneficio de las colonoscopias de detección

SAGES desea aclarar los resultados del estudio NordICC y colocarlos en contexto de los esfuerzos de varias agencias nacionales para reducir el riesgo de cáncer colorrectal – la segunda causa de muerte por cáncer más frecuente en los Estados Unidos-, mediante la promoción de la detección y tratamiento oportuno de las lesiones.

SAGES Response to NordICC Study Regarding Benefit of Screening Colonoscopies

The NordICC Study recently published in The New England Journal of Medicine and widely reported on by media outlets has raised questions regarding the benefit of screening colonoscopy in lowering the risk of colorectal cancer and cancer-related deaths among otherwise healthy and symptom-free men and women aged 55 to 64. Provocative headlines and commentaries have […]

Contact SAGES

Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons
11300 W. Olympic Blvd Suite 600
Los Angeles, CA 90064 USA
webmaster@sages.org
Tel: (310) 437-0544

Find Us Around the Web!

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Important Links

SAGES 2023 Meeting Information

Healthy Sooner: Patient Information

SAGES Guidelines, Statements, & Standards of Practice

SAGES Manuals

 

  • taTME Study Info
  • Foundation
  • SAGES.TV
  • MyCME
  • Educational Activities

Copyright © 2023 Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons