• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

SAGES

Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons

  • Home
    • Search
    • SAGES Home
    • SAGES Foundation Home
  • About
    • Committees
      • Descriptions and Video Updates
      • Request to Join a SAGES Committee
      • SAGES Board of Governors
      • Officers and Representatives of the Society
      • Committee Chairs and Mentors
      • Full Committee Rosters
      • SAGES Past Presidents
    • Donate to the SAGES Foundation
    • SAGES Mission Statement
    • SAGES Resource Guide
    • Awards
      • George Berci Award
      • Pioneer in Surgical Endoscopy
      • Excellence In Clinical Care
      • International Ambassador
      • IRCAD Visiting Fellowship
      • Distinguished Service
      • Young Researcher
      • Researcher in Training
      • Jeff Ponsky Master Educator
      • Excellence in Medical Leadership
      • The Brandeis
      • Advocacy Summit Award
      • RAFT Annual Meeting Abstract Contest and Awards
  • Meetings
    • SAGES 2019 Meeting Information
    • 2019 Scientific Session Call For Abstracts
    • 2019 Emerging Technology Session Call For Abstracts
    • 2018 Prevent BDI Consensus Conference
    • CME Claim Form
    • Industry
      • Advertising Opportunities
      • Exhibit Opportunities
      • Sponsorship Opportunities
    • Future Meetings
    • Past Meetings
      • Leadership Development and Health Policy Conference Videos
      • SAGES Quality Summit Meeting
      • SAGES 2018
      • SAGES 2017
      • SAGES 2016
      • SAGES 2015
      • SAGES 2014
      • SAGES 2013
    • Related Meetings Calendar
  • Membership
    • Join SAGES!
    • Give the Gift of SAGES Membership
    • Membership Benefits
    • Active Membership
    • Allied Health Membership
    • Associate Active Membership
    • Candidate Membership
    • International Membership
    • Medical Student Membership
  • For Patients
    • Healthy Sooner – Patient Information for Minimally Invasive Surgery
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Find a SAGES Member
  • Publications
    • SAGES Clinical / Practice / Training Guidelines, Statements, and Standards of Practice
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • TAVAC – Technology and Value Assessments
    • Surgical Endoscopy and Other Journal Information
    • SAGES Manuals
    • SCOPE – The SAGES Newsletter
    • Troubleshooting Guides
  • Education
    • The Safe Cholecystectomy Didactic Modules
    • Masters Series
      • SAGES Masters Program Facebook Collaboratives
      • Acute Care Surgery
      • Bariatric
      • Biliary
      • Colorectal
      • Flexible Endoscopy (upper or lower)
      • Foregut
      • Hernia
      • Robotics
    • Educational Opportunities
    • The SAGES HPB/Solid Organ Program
    • The SAGES Safe Cholecystectomy Program
    • Courses for Residents
      • Advanced Courses
      • Basic Courses
    • Endorsed Courses
    • SAGES Robotics Fellows Course
    • MIS Fellows Course
    • Free Educational Webinars
    • SMART Enhanced Recovery Program
    • SAGES Quality Initiative
    • SAGES OR SAFETY Video
    • SAGES.TV Video Library
    • SAGES Surgical WIKI
    • iMAGES Image Library
    • SAGES at Cine-Med
      • SAGES Top 21 MIS Procedures
      • SAGES Pearls
      • SAGES Flexible Endoscopy 101
      • SAGES Tips & Tricks of the Top 21
  • Opportunities
    • SAGES Research Opportunities
    • SAGES Endorsed Courses
    • Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery
    • Fundamentals of Endoscopic Surgery
    • Fundamental Use of Surgical Energy
    • Job Board
    • SAGES Go Global: Global Affairs and Humanitarian Efforts
  • Search
    • Search All SAGES Content
    • Search the Video Library
  • Log In

How Do We Make Decsions Regarding Cancer Management?

INTRODUCTION

This study aims to: (1) to examine how clinicians in the United Kingdom make decisions related to cancer, and (2) to identify need for support for such decisions. Involvement of patients in medical decision making process is becoming increasingly important within the current healthcare system. The paternalistic model (in which decisions are made for patients) seems to have been replaced by the informed model (in which patients make decisions on their own based on information given by the health-care providers) and shared decision-making model (in which clinicians and patients collaborate with each other to make decisions). Shared decision-making model (SDM) is regarded as the ideal form of decision making in modern health care. It allows patients freedom of choice, while at the same time provides necessary support in the decision making process.

METHODS AND PROCEDURES

We conducted an interview study (August 2009) involving 20 clinicians (10 registrar surgeons and 10 consultants) from various hospitals in London who were experienced in cancer management. The clinicians gave their opinion about: (1) the decisions they considered difficult to make by themselves and by their patients, (2) whether and to what extent they influenced patients’ decisions and (3) how they assessed the quality of the decisions.

We recorded and transcribed the interviews and analyzed the scripts using key-word analysis and cognitive-mapping.

RESULTS

A majority of the clinicians considered the decision of whether or not to operate difficult both for them and for their patients, due to certain diagnostic limitations in staging tumours, uncertainties regarding the outcomes, compounded by the difficulties for patients to imagine a different life style and predict their future requirements. They also believed some patients find it difficult to decide whether or not to trust the clinicians.

On the other hand, five registrar surgeons believed they did not influence patients’ decision making, stating their role was to provide information for patients and that it was impossible for them to gauge how patients could have made the decisions. Two senior clinicians acknowledged that patients did not perceive they had a decision to make at all. Decision qualities were commonly assessed based on peer consensus, less so on patients’ feedbacks.

CONCLUSIONS

As a pilot, this study is limited in the representativeness of the sample. Future studies should explore the extent to which these findings hold true for a larger population of clinicians with different specialities and working at different hospitals. However, our study demonstrated a clear need to raise awareness among clinicians in terms of making decisions with patients rather than for patients. Most clinicians understand the importance of patients’ preferences, though having difficulties in making use of them. In other words, SDM is promising but is still competing with the traditional paternalistic model. It is important that decision aids for patients should promote SDM as one of its aims, or at least, be conductive to the interactions between clinicians and patients.


Session: Poster

Program Number: P199

View Poster

Post Views: 6

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Pinterest
  • WhatsApp
  • Reddit

Related

« Return to SAGES 2010 abstract archive

Recently, on SAGES…

Robotic Surgery

Spotlight: Robotics Committee

In the most recent issue of SCOPE, SAGES President Dr. Jeffrey Marks shared his desire to highlight the hard work of the many SAGES committees. As the Society strives to fully realize the new SAGES University Masters Program, the initial focus will be on the affiliated pathway committees and task forces. This is the third […]

Mastering the Art of Surgery – Annual Meeting Press Release

Mastering the Art of Surgery At the 16th World Congress of Endoscopic Surgery and 2018 SAGES Meeting April 11th–14th in Seattle, WA The Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) will kick off its 2018 Annual Meeting as part of the 16th World Congress of Endoscopic Surgery. Hosted by SAGES and CAGS (Canadian Association […]

Complete the SAGES Video Based Assessment Survey for a Chance to Win!

https://survey.az1.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_5pCM9JWvDBphkjj Who Can Enter Open to any surgeon who is either a member of SAGES or an attendee at the 2018 SAGES Annual Meeting AND who completes the 2018 SAGES Video Based Assessment Online Survey at the link above. Drawing Entry Period The drawing period is from survey launch on April 6, 2018 to 11:59pm […]

Contact SAGES

Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons
11300 W. Olympic Blvd Suite 600
Los Angeles, CA 90064 USA
webmaster@sages.org
Tel: (310) 437-0544

Find Us Around the Web!

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Newsletter Subscription

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Important Links

SAGES 2019 Meeting Information

Online Registration coming in Fall 2018

Healthy Sooner: Patient Information

  • taTME Study Info
  • Foundation
  • SAGES.TV
  • MyCME
  • Educational Activities

· Log in

Copyright © 2019 Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons · Legal
· Managed by BSC Management, Inc