• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

SAGES

Reimagining surgical care for a healthier world

  • Home
    • COVID-19 Annoucements
    • Search
    • SAGES Home
    • SAGES Foundation Home
  • About
    • Who is SAGES?
    • SAGES Mission Statement
    • Advocacy
    • Strategic Plan, 2020-2023
    • Committees
      • Request to Join a SAGES Committee
      • SAGES Board of Governors
      • Officers and Representatives of the Society
      • Committee Chairs and Co-Chairs
      • Full Committee Rosters
      • SAGES Past Presidents
    • Donate to the SAGES Foundation
    • Awards
      • George Berci Award
      • Pioneer in Surgical Endoscopy
      • Excellence In Clinical Care
      • International Ambassador
      • IRCAD Visiting Fellowship
      • Social Justice and Health Equity
      • Excellence in Community Surgery
      • Distinguished Service
      • Early Career Researcher
      • Researcher in Training
      • Jeff Ponsky Master Educator
      • Excellence in Medical Leadership
      • Barbara Berci Memorial Award
      • Brandeis Scholarship
      • Advocacy Summit
      • RAFT Annual Meeting Abstract Contest and Awards
  • Meetings
    • NBT Innovation Weekend
    • SAGES Annual Meeting
      • 2023 Scientific Session Call For Abstracts
      • 2023 Emerging Technology Call For Abstracts
    • CME Claim Form
    • Industry
      • Advertising Opportunities
      • Exhibit Opportunities
      • Sponsorship Opportunities
    • Future Meetings
    • Past Meetings
      • SAGES 2022
      • SAGES 2021
    • Related Meetings Calendar
  • Join SAGES!
    • Membership Benefits
    • Membership Applications
      • Active Membership
      • Affiliate Membership
      • Associate Active Membership
      • Candidate Membership
      • International Membership
      • Medical Student Membership
    • Member News
      • Member Spotlight
      • Give the Gift of SAGES Membership
  • Patients
    • Healthy Sooner – Patient Information for Minimally Invasive Surgery
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Choosing Wisely – An Initiative of the ABIM Foundation
    • All in the Recovery: Colorectal Cancer Alliance
    • Find a SAGES Member
  • Publications
    • SAGES Stories Podcast
    • SAGES Clinical / Practice / Training Guidelines, Statements, and Standards of Practice
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • TAVAC – Technology and Value Assessments
    • Surgical Endoscopy and Other Journal Information
    • SAGES Manuals
    • SCOPE – The SAGES Newsletter
    • COVID-19 Annoucements
    • Troubleshooting Guides
  • Education
    • OpiVoid.org
    • SAGES.TV Video Library
    • Safe Cholecystectomy Program
      • Safe Cholecystectomy Didactic Modules
    • Masters Program
      • SAGES Facebook Program Collaboratives
      • Acute Care Surgery
      • Bariatric
      • Biliary
      • Colorectal
      • Flexible Endoscopy (upper or lower)
      • Foregut
      • Hernia
      • Robotics
    • Educational Opportunities
    • HPB/Solid Organ Program
    • Courses for Residents
      • Advanced Courses
      • Basic Courses
    • Video Based Assessments (VBA)
    • Robotics Fellows Course
    • MIS Fellows Course
    • Facebook Livestreams
    • Free Webinars For Residents
    • SMART Enhanced Recovery Program
    • SAGES OR SAFETY Video
    • SAGES at Cine-Med
      • SAGES Top 21 MIS Procedures
      • SAGES Pearls
      • SAGES Flexible Endoscopy 101
      • SAGES Tips & Tricks of the Top 21
  • Opportunities
    • NEW-Area of Concentrated Training Seal (ACT)-Advanced Flexible Endoscopy-Coming Soon!
    • SAGES Fellowship Certification for Advanced GI MIS and Comprehensive Flexible Endoscopy
    • Multi-Society Foregut Fellowship Certification
    • SAGES Research Opportunities
    • Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery
    • Fundamentals of Endoscopic Surgery
    • Fundamental Use of Surgical Energy
    • Job Board
    • SAGES Go Global: Global Affairs and Humanitarian Efforts
  • Search
    • Search All SAGES Content
    • Search SAGES Guidelines
    • Search the Video Library
    • Search the Image Library
    • Search the Abstracts Archive
  • Store
    • “Unofficial” Logo Products
  • Log In

Glucose and Insulin Response to GTT: A prospective comparison between Roux En Y Gastric Bypass, Vertical Sleeve Gastrectomy and Duodenal Switch at 1 year

Mitchell S Roslin, MD, FACS, Yuriy Dudiy, MD, Joanne Weiskopf, PA, Paresh C Shah, MD, FACS

Lenox Hill Hospital, North Shore-LIJ Health System

Background: Long term glucose and insulin homeostasis after bariatric surgery is still poorly understood. Reactive hypoglycemia after Gastric Bypass has been characterized by our group and others as having a strong hyperinsulinemia component which may contribute to weight regain thru food seeking behaviors. This prospective, non randomized IRB approved study is designed to assess the impact of 3 common stapling procedures (RYGB, VSG, DS) on glucose and insulin as measured by liquid and solid Glucose Tolerance Testing at 6,9, and 12 months post operatively. 38 patients were enrolled.

Methods: All patients enrolled had a Oral Glucose Tolerance Test (OGTT) as well as fasting glucose, insulin, HbA1c, c Peptide levels pre-operatively and at 6, 9, and 12 months post-operatively. The 9 month testing was performed with a solid meal. Ratios of Glucose and Insulin at 1hr/2hr and fasting/1hr were calculated. Statistical Analysis was performed with ANOVA and students paired T test.

Results: All groups were similar at baseline other than the DS group having a higher BMI. The results of GTT between liquid and solid challenges were not statistically different. All operations resulted in significant weight loss, reduction of fasting glucose, and improved insulin sensitivity. The rates of increase and the peak glucose and insulin levels after GTT were greatest in RYGB patients. The 1hr insulin level was higher than the pre-operative in this group. This was accompanied by a faster decline in glucose at 2 hrs. In comparison, the DS patients had a slower and lower total rise in glucose and insulin and the lowest HGBA1c levels (p<0.05). The VSG patients had results that were in between RYGB and DS, but were significantly different from RYGB as well.

Conclusions:The RYGB has a significantly dysfunctional insulin response to OGTT and creates hypoglycemia as a result. The VSG and DS preserve a more physiologic insulin response to OGTT without the supra-normal peaks. The DS response is substantially better than the VSG as well, suggesting that pyloric preservation, is not the only factor contributing to improved glucose homeostasis.

# of pts BMI Glucose, fasting Glucose, 1hr Glucose, 2hrs Insulin, fasting Insulin, 1hr Insulin, 2hrs
RYGB

Preop 12 47.3±10 105.5±32 182.0±82 160.2±91 25.9±23 76.7±81 56.2±82
6 mo 12 36.8±7 86.9±14 165.3±87† 88.9±51 3.6±1 76.25±45†‡ 15.7±23
9 mo 11 36.1±8 84.7±10 138.6±64*† 87.2±42 3.9±2.4† 72.8±74 11.4±9.5†
12 mo 9 30.8±8 96.0±27 165.5±100 90.8±68 8.7±7.2° 136.9±111*° 10.8±6.8*
VSG

Preop 13 45.7±8‡ 98.2±26 146.6±61 127.5±74 25.7±26 59.9±35 46.2±48
6mo 13 35.3±6 83.0±10 131.2±59 82.2±50 11.8±25 70.2±48 32.9±63
9 mo 13 35.0±10 81.9±13 97.9±32* 83.0±27 11.0±23 40.0±44 24.8±55
12 mo 10 33.8±5 85.8±20 133.7±62 82.7±40 12.0±26 56.9±43.0* 40.2±62*‡
DS

Preop 13 54.1±9‡ 97.2±39 151.8±74 125.8±79 13.8±9 77.2±50 50.3±31
6 mo 13 38.2±7 77.9±18 102.9±61† 80.8±31 3.4±1.6 36.6±28†‡ 15±9
9 mo 9 30.5±14 79.8±14 97.3±27† 79.0±21 3.2±1.4† 29.0±32 6.7±3.4†
12 mo 8 28.0±7 83.0±23 102.7±42 68.7±24 3.1±1.1° 31.1±15° 6.5±5.2‡

* p < 0.05 RYGB versus VSG
† p < 0.05 RYGB versus DS
‡ p < 0.05 VSG versus DS
° p < 0.01 RYGB versus DS


Session: Podium Presentation

Program Number: S100

253

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Pinterest
  • WhatsApp
  • Reddit

Related

« Return to SAGES 2013 abstract archive

Our Mission

Innovate, educate and collaborate to improve patient care.

Recently, on SAGES…

Critical View of Safety (CVS) Challenge QR Code

The SAGES Critical View of Safety Challenge – Donate Your Lap Chole Videos!

The Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons is hosting the first Artificial Intelligence Data Challenge conducted by surgeons. The aim of this challenge is to generate a large and diverse dataset of laparoscopic cholecystectomy videos, annotated with respect to the subcomponents of the Critical View of Safety (CVS). Computer scientists from all over the […]

Respuesta de SAGES al Estudio NordICC sobre el beneficio de las colonoscopias de detección

SAGES desea aclarar los resultados del estudio NordICC y colocarlos en contexto de los esfuerzos de varias agencias nacionales para reducir el riesgo de cáncer colorrectal – la segunda causa de muerte por cáncer más frecuente en los Estados Unidos-, mediante la promoción de la detección y tratamiento oportuno de las lesiones.

SAGES Response to NordICC Study Regarding Benefit of Screening Colonoscopies

The NordICC Study recently published in The New England Journal of Medicine and widely reported on by media outlets has raised questions regarding the benefit of screening colonoscopy in lowering the risk of colorectal cancer and cancer-related deaths among otherwise healthy and symptom-free men and women aged 55 to 64. Provocative headlines and commentaries have […]

Contact SAGES

Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons
11300 W. Olympic Blvd Suite 600
Los Angeles, CA 90064 USA
webmaster@sages.org
Tel: (310) 437-0544

Find Us Around the Web!

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Important Links

SAGES 2023 Meeting Information

Healthy Sooner: Patient Information

SAGES Guidelines, Statements, & Standards of Practice

SAGES Manuals

 

  • taTME Study Info
  • Foundation
  • SAGES.TV
  • MyCME
  • Educational Activities

Copyright © 2023 Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons