• Skip to main content
  • Skip to header right navigation
  • Skip to site footer

Log in
  • Search
    • Search All SAGES Content
    • Search SAGES Guidelines
    • Search the Video Library
    • Search the Image Library
    • Search the Abstracts Archive
www.sages.org

SAGES

Reimagining surgical care for a healthier world

  • Home
    • Search
    • SAGES Home
    • SAGES Foundation Home
  • About
    • Awards
    • Who Is SAGES?
    • Leadership
    • Our Mission
    • Advocacy
    • Committees
      • SAGES Board of Governors
      • Officers and Representatives of the Society
      • Committee Chairs and Co-Chairs
      • Committee Rosters
      • SAGES Past Presidents
  • Meetings
    • SAGES NBT Innovation Weekend
    • SAGES Annual Meeting
      • 2026 Scientific Session Call for Abstracts
      • 2026 Emerging Technology Call for Abstracts
    • CME Claim Form
    • SAGES Past, Present, Future, and Related Meeting Information
    • SAGES Related Meetings & Events Calendar
  • Join SAGES!
    • Membership Application
    • Membership Benefits
    • Membership Types
      • Requirements and Applications for Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Affiliate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Associate Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Candidate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for International Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements for Medical Student Membership
    • Member Spotlight
    • Give the Gift of SAGES Membership
  • Patients
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Healthy Sooner – Patient Information for Minimally Invasive Surgery
    • Choosing Wisely – An Initiative of the ABIM Foundation
    • All in the Recovery: Colorectal Cancer Alliance
    • Find A SAGES Surgeon
  • Publications
    • Clinical / Practice / Training Guidelines, Statements, and Standards of Practice
    • Sustainability in Surgical Practice
    • SAGES Stories Podcast
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Patient Information From SAGES
    • TAVAC – Technology and Value Assessments
    • Surgical Endoscopy and Other Journal Information
    • SAGES Manuals
    • MesSAGES – The SAGES Newsletter
    • COVID-19 Archive
    • Troubleshooting Guides
  • Education
    • Wellness Resources – You Are Not Alone
    • Avoid Opiates After Surgery
    • SAGES Subscription Catalog
    • SAGES TV: Home of SAGES Surgical Videos
    • The SAGES Safe Cholecystectomy Program
    • Masters Program
    • Resident and Fellow Opportunities
      • MIS Fellows Course
      • SAGES Robotics Residents and Fellows Courses
      • SAGES Free Resident Webinar Series
      • Fluorescence-Guided Surgery Course for Fellows
      • Fellows’ Career Development Course
    • SAGES S.M.A.R.T. Enhanced Recovery Program
    • SAGES @ Cine-Med Products
      • SAGES Top 21 Minimally Invasive Procedures Every Practicing Surgeon Should Know
      • SAGES Pearls Step-by-Step
      • SAGES Flexible Endoscopy 101
    • SAGES OR SAFETY Video Activity
  • Opportunities
    • Fellowship Recognition Opportunities
    • SAGES Advanced Flexible Endoscopy Area of Concentrated Training (ACT) SEAL
    • Multi-Society Foregut Fellowship Certification
    • Research Opportunities
    • FLS
    • FES
    • FUSE
    • Jobs Board
    • SAGES Go Global: Global Affairs and Humanitarian Efforts
  • OWLS/FLS
You are here: Home / Abstracts / Factors Associated with Bariatric Surgery Utilization among Eligible Patients

Factors Associated with Bariatric Surgery Utilization among Eligible Patients

Rafael Alvarez, MD, Niki Matusko, MSc, Colleen M Buda, PAC, Oliver A Varban, MD. University of Michigan

Background: Despite its known safety and efficacy, bariatric surgery is an underutilized treatment for morbid obesity in the United States.

Objective: Our goal was to identify factors associated with failing to proceed with surgery despite being considered an eligible candidate by a bariatric surgery program.

Methods: This is a retrospective study that includes all patients (n=486) who attended a bariatric surgery informational session (BIS) at a single center academic institution in 2015. Eligible candidates were identified after clinical evaluation and multidisciplinary candidacy review (MCR). We compared patients who underwent surgery to those who did not (i.e. dropped out) by evaluating patient-specific, insurance-specific, and bariatric surgery program-specific variables. Univariate analysis and multivariable regression were performed to identify risk factors associated with failing to undergo surgery among eligible candidates.

Results: We identified 307 (63%) patients who completed all initial clinical evaluations and underwent MCR. Among these patients, 33 (11%) were deemed poor candidates and surgery was not recommended. Among the remaining eligible candidates, 82 (30%) did not undergo surgery. When compared to patients who underwent surgery (n=192), eligible patients who dropped out had higher rates of coronary artery disease (CAD) (11.0% vs 1.04%; p<0.0001), hypertension (HTN) (63.4% vs 42.7%; p=0.002), active smoking (18.3% vs 7.29%; p=0.007), and a longer waiting period between their BIS and MCR (164 days vs 103 days; p=0.004). In addition, patients who dropped out were more likely to have Medicare (18.75% vs 8.90%; p=0.022) and require 3 months (7.3% vs 1.0%; p=0.01) or 12 months (7.3% vs 2.1%; p=0.07) of medically supervised weight loss documentation (MSWLD). There was also a higher rate of program-specific requirements among patients who dropped out (7.2 vs 5.3 requirements, p<0.0001). Independent risk factors associated with decreased odds of undergoing surgery included: CAD (OR 0.13 [0.02-0.66]; p=0.014), HTN (OR 0.46 [0.24-0.87]; p=0.017), time from BIS to MCR (OR 0.99 [0.99-0.99]; p=0.002), 3 months of MSWLD (OR 0.09 [0.02-0.51]; p=0.007), endocrinology clearance (OR 0.26 [0.09-0.76]; p=0.014), hematology clearance (OR 0.37 [0.14-0.95]; p=0.039), urine drug screen testing (OR 0.31 [0.13-0.72]; p=0.006), required psychotherapy (OR 0.43 [0.20-0.93]; p=0.031), and required extra sessions with the dietitian (OR 0.39 [0.17-0.92]; p=0.032).

Conclusions: Approximately one third of patients did not undergo bariatric surgery despite being considered eligible candidates after multidisciplinary review. Dropout rates were independently associated with patient, insurance, and program-specific variables which may represent barriers to care amenable to improvement.


Presented at the SAGES 2017 Annual Meeting in Houston, TX.

Abstract ID: 86680

Program Number: P577

Presentation Session: iPoster Session (Non CME)

Presentation Type: Poster

58

Share this:

  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window) Pocket
  • Click to share on Mastodon (Opens in new window) Mastodon
  • Click to share on Threads (Opens in new window) Threads
  • Click to share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky

Related


sages_adbutler_leaderboard

Hours & Info

11300 West Olympic Blvd, Suite 600
Los Angeles, CA 90064

1-310-437-0544

[email protected]

Monday – Friday
8am to 5pm Pacific Time

Find Us Around the Web!

  • Bluesky
  • X
  • Instagram
  • Facebook
  • YouTube

Copyright © 2025 · SAGES · All Rights Reserved

Important Links

Healthy Sooner: Patient Information

SAGES Guidelines, Statements, & Standards of Practice

SAGES Manuals