• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

SAGES

Reimagining surgical care for a healthier world

  • Home
    • COVID-19 Annoucements
    • Search
    • SAGES Home
    • SAGES Foundation Home
  • About
    • Who is SAGES?
    • SAGES Mission Statement
    • Advocacy
    • Strategic Plan, 2020-2023
    • Committees
      • Request to Join a SAGES Committee
      • SAGES Board of Governors
      • Officers and Representatives of the Society
      • Committee Chairs and Co-Chairs
      • Full Committee Rosters
      • SAGES Past Presidents
    • Donate to the SAGES Foundation
    • Awards
      • George Berci Award
      • Pioneer in Surgical Endoscopy
      • Excellence In Clinical Care
      • International Ambassador
      • IRCAD Visiting Fellowship
      • Social Justice and Health Equity
      • Excellence in Community Surgery
      • Distinguished Service
      • Early Career Researcher
      • Researcher in Training
      • Jeff Ponsky Master Educator
      • Excellence in Medical Leadership
      • Barbara Berci Memorial Award
      • Brandeis Scholarship
      • Advocacy Summit
      • RAFT Annual Meeting Abstract Contest and Awards
  • Meetings
    • NBT Innovation Weekend
    • SAGES Annual Meeting
      • 2023 Scientific Session Call For Abstracts
      • 2023 Emerging Technology Call For Abstracts
    • CME Claim Form
    • Industry
      • Advertising Opportunities
      • Exhibit Opportunities
      • Sponsorship Opportunities
    • Future Meetings
    • Past Meetings
      • SAGES 2022
      • SAGES 2021
    • Related Meetings Calendar
  • Join SAGES!
    • Membership Benefits
    • Membership Applications
      • Active Membership
      • Affiliate Membership
      • Associate Active Membership
      • Candidate Membership
      • International Membership
      • Medical Student Membership
    • Member News
      • Member Spotlight
      • Give the Gift of SAGES Membership
  • Patients
    • Healthy Sooner – Patient Information for Minimally Invasive Surgery
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Choosing Wisely – An Initiative of the ABIM Foundation
    • All in the Recovery: Colorectal Cancer Alliance
    • Find a SAGES Member
  • Publications
    • SAGES Stories Podcast
    • SAGES Clinical / Practice / Training Guidelines, Statements, and Standards of Practice
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • TAVAC – Technology and Value Assessments
    • Surgical Endoscopy and Other Journal Information
    • SAGES Manuals
    • SCOPE – The SAGES Newsletter
    • COVID-19 Annoucements
    • Troubleshooting Guides
  • Education
    • OpiVoid.org
    • SAGES.TV Video Library
    • Safe Cholecystectomy Program
      • Safe Cholecystectomy Didactic Modules
    • Masters Program
      • SAGES Facebook Program Collaboratives
      • Acute Care Surgery
      • Bariatric
      • Biliary
      • Colorectal
      • Flexible Endoscopy (upper or lower)
      • Foregut
      • Hernia
      • Robotics
    • Educational Opportunities
    • HPB/Solid Organ Program
    • Courses for Residents
      • Advanced Courses
      • Basic Courses
    • Video Based Assessments (VBA)
    • Robotics Fellows Course
    • MIS Fellows Course
    • Facebook Livestreams
    • Free Webinars For Residents
    • SMART Enhanced Recovery Program
    • SAGES OR SAFETY Video
    • SAGES at Cine-Med
      • SAGES Top 21 MIS Procedures
      • SAGES Pearls
      • SAGES Flexible Endoscopy 101
      • SAGES Tips & Tricks of the Top 21
  • Opportunities
    • NEW-Area of Concentrated Training Seal (ACT)-Advanced Flexible Endoscopy-Coming Soon!
    • SAGES Fellowship Certification for Advanced GI MIS and Comprehensive Flexible Endoscopy
    • Multi-Society Foregut Fellowship Certification
    • SAGES Research Opportunities
    • Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery
    • Fundamentals of Endoscopic Surgery
    • Fundamental Use of Surgical Energy
    • Job Board
    • SAGES Go Global: Global Affairs and Humanitarian Efforts
  • Search
    • Search All SAGES Content
    • Search SAGES Guidelines
    • Search the Video Library
    • Search the Image Library
    • Search the Abstracts Archive
  • Store
    • “Unofficial” Logo Products
  • Log In

Factors Associated with Bariatric Surgery Utilization among Eligible Patients

Rafael Alvarez, MD, Niki Matusko, MSc, Colleen M Buda, PAC, Oliver A Varban, MD. University of Michigan

Background: Despite its known safety and efficacy, bariatric surgery is an underutilized treatment for morbid obesity in the United States.

Objective: Our goal was to identify factors associated with failing to proceed with surgery despite being considered an eligible candidate by a bariatric surgery program.

Methods: This is a retrospective study that includes all patients (n=486) who attended a bariatric surgery informational session (BIS) at a single center academic institution in 2015. Eligible candidates were identified after clinical evaluation and multidisciplinary candidacy review (MCR). We compared patients who underwent surgery to those who did not (i.e. dropped out) by evaluating patient-specific, insurance-specific, and bariatric surgery program-specific variables. Univariate analysis and multivariable regression were performed to identify risk factors associated with failing to undergo surgery among eligible candidates.

Results: We identified 307 (63%) patients who completed all initial clinical evaluations and underwent MCR. Among these patients, 33 (11%) were deemed poor candidates and surgery was not recommended. Among the remaining eligible candidates, 82 (30%) did not undergo surgery. When compared to patients who underwent surgery (n=192), eligible patients who dropped out had higher rates of coronary artery disease (CAD) (11.0% vs 1.04%; p<0.0001), hypertension (HTN) (63.4% vs 42.7%; p=0.002), active smoking (18.3% vs 7.29%; p=0.007), and a longer waiting period between their BIS and MCR (164 days vs 103 days; p=0.004). In addition, patients who dropped out were more likely to have Medicare (18.75% vs 8.90%; p=0.022) and require 3 months (7.3% vs 1.0%; p=0.01) or 12 months (7.3% vs 2.1%; p=0.07) of medically supervised weight loss documentation (MSWLD). There was also a higher rate of program-specific requirements among patients who dropped out (7.2 vs 5.3 requirements, p<0.0001). Independent risk factors associated with decreased odds of undergoing surgery included: CAD (OR 0.13 [0.02-0.66]; p=0.014), HTN (OR 0.46 [0.24-0.87]; p=0.017), time from BIS to MCR (OR 0.99 [0.99-0.99]; p=0.002), 3 months of MSWLD (OR 0.09 [0.02-0.51]; p=0.007), endocrinology clearance (OR 0.26 [0.09-0.76]; p=0.014), hematology clearance (OR 0.37 [0.14-0.95]; p=0.039), urine drug screen testing (OR 0.31 [0.13-0.72]; p=0.006), required psychotherapy (OR 0.43 [0.20-0.93]; p=0.031), and required extra sessions with the dietitian (OR 0.39 [0.17-0.92]; p=0.032).

Conclusions: Approximately one third of patients did not undergo bariatric surgery despite being considered eligible candidates after multidisciplinary review. Dropout rates were independently associated with patient, insurance, and program-specific variables which may represent barriers to care amenable to improvement.


Presented at the SAGES 2017 Annual Meeting in Houston, TX.

Abstract ID: 86680

Program Number: P577

Presentation Session: iPoster Session (Non CME)

Presentation Type: Poster

55

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Pinterest
  • WhatsApp
  • Reddit

Related

« Return to SAGES 2018 abstract archive

Our Mission

Innovate, educate and collaborate to improve patient care.

Recently, on SAGES…

Critical View of Safety (CVS) Challenge QR Code

The SAGES Critical View of Safety Challenge – Donate Your Lap Chole Videos!

The Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons is hosting the first Artificial Intelligence Data Challenge conducted by surgeons. The aim of this challenge is to generate a large and diverse dataset of laparoscopic cholecystectomy videos, annotated with respect to the subcomponents of the Critical View of Safety (CVS). Computer scientists from all over the […]

Respuesta de SAGES al Estudio NordICC sobre el beneficio de las colonoscopias de detección

SAGES desea aclarar los resultados del estudio NordICC y colocarlos en contexto de los esfuerzos de varias agencias nacionales para reducir el riesgo de cáncer colorrectal – la segunda causa de muerte por cáncer más frecuente en los Estados Unidos-, mediante la promoción de la detección y tratamiento oportuno de las lesiones.

SAGES Response to NordICC Study Regarding Benefit of Screening Colonoscopies

The NordICC Study recently published in The New England Journal of Medicine and widely reported on by media outlets has raised questions regarding the benefit of screening colonoscopy in lowering the risk of colorectal cancer and cancer-related deaths among otherwise healthy and symptom-free men and women aged 55 to 64. Provocative headlines and commentaries have […]

Contact SAGES

Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons
11300 W. Olympic Blvd Suite 600
Los Angeles, CA 90064 USA
webmaster@sages.org
Tel: (310) 437-0544

Find Us Around the Web!

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Important Links

SAGES 2023 Meeting Information

Healthy Sooner: Patient Information

SAGES Guidelines, Statements, & Standards of Practice

SAGES Manuals

 

  • taTME Study Info
  • Foundation
  • SAGES.TV
  • MyCME
  • Educational Activities

Copyright © 2023 Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons