• Skip to main content
  • Skip to header right navigation
  • Skip to site footer

Log in
  • Search
    • Search All SAGES Content
    • Search SAGES Guidelines
    • Search the Video Library
    • Search the Image Library
    • Search the Abstracts Archive
www.sages.org

SAGES

Reimagining surgical care for a healthier world

  • Home
    • Search
    • SAGES Home
    • SAGES Foundation Home
  • About
    • Awards
    • Who Is SAGES?
    • Leadership
    • Our Mission
    • Advocacy
    • Committees
      • SAGES Board of Governors
      • Officers and Representatives of the Society
      • Committee Chairs and Co-Chairs
      • Committee Rosters
      • SAGES Past Presidents
  • Meetings
    • SAGES NBT Innovation Weekend
    • SAGES Annual Meeting
      • 2026 Scientific Session Call for Abstracts
      • 2026 Emerging Technology Call for Abstracts
    • CME Claim Form
    • SAGES Past, Present, Future, and Related Meeting Information
    • SAGES Related Meetings & Events Calendar
  • Join SAGES!
    • Membership Application
    • Membership Benefits
    • Membership Types
      • Requirements and Applications for Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Affiliate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Associate Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Candidate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for International Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements for Medical Student Membership
    • Member Spotlight
    • Give the Gift of SAGES Membership
  • Patients
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Healthy Sooner – Patient Information for Minimally Invasive Surgery
    • Choosing Wisely – An Initiative of the ABIM Foundation
    • All in the Recovery: Colorectal Cancer Alliance
    • Find A SAGES Surgeon
  • Publications
    • Clinical / Practice / Training Guidelines, Statements, and Standards of Practice
    • Sustainability in Surgical Practice
    • SAGES Stories Podcast
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Patient Information From SAGES
    • TAVAC – Technology and Value Assessments
    • Surgical Endoscopy and Other Journal Information
    • SAGES Manuals
    • MesSAGES – The SAGES Newsletter
    • COVID-19 Archive
    • Troubleshooting Guides
  • Education
    • Wellness Resources – You Are Not Alone
    • Avoid Opiates After Surgery
    • SAGES Subscription Catalog
    • SAGES TV: Home of SAGES Surgical Videos
    • The SAGES Safe Cholecystectomy Program
    • Masters Program
    • Resident and Fellow Opportunities
      • MIS Fellows Course
      • SAGES Robotics Residents and Fellows Courses
      • SAGES Free Resident Webinar Series
      • Fluorescence-Guided Surgery Course for Fellows
      • Fellows’ Career Development Course
    • SAGES S.M.A.R.T. Enhanced Recovery Program
    • SAGES @ Cine-Med Products
      • SAGES Top 21 Minimally Invasive Procedures Every Practicing Surgeon Should Know
      • SAGES Pearls Step-by-Step
      • SAGES Flexible Endoscopy 101
    • SAGES OR SAFETY Video Activity
  • Opportunities
    • Fellowship Recognition Opportunities
    • SAGES Advanced Flexible Endoscopy Area of Concentrated Training (ACT) SEAL
    • Multi-Society Foregut Fellowship Certification
    • Research Opportunities
    • FLS
    • FES
    • FUSE
    • Jobs Board
    • SAGES Go Global: Global Affairs and Humanitarian Efforts
  • OWLS/FLS
You are here: Home / Abstracts / ERGONOMICS OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY: AN ANALYSIS OF MUSCLE EFFORT AND FATIGUE IN THE OPERATING ROOM BETWEEN LAPAROSCOPIC AND ROBOTIC APPROACHES.

ERGONOMICS OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY: AN ANALYSIS OF MUSCLE EFFORT AND FATIGUE IN THE OPERATING ROOM BETWEEN LAPAROSCOPIC AND ROBOTIC APPROACHES.

Priscila R Armijo, MD, Chun-Kai Huang, PhD, Ka-Chun Siu, PhD, Dmitry Oleynikov, MD. University of Nebraska Medical Center

Introduction: The aim of this study was to determine how objectively-measured and self-reported muscle effort and fatigue of the upper-limb differ between laparoscopic (LAP) and robotic-assisted (RA) surgical approaches in the operating room.

Methods: Surgeons (fellows or attending physicians) performing either LAP or RA procedures at a single-institution were enrolled in this study. Objective muscle activation and self-reported fatigue were evaluated, and comparisons were made between approaches. Muscle activation of the upper trapezius, anterior deltoid, flexor carpi radialis, and extensor digitorum were recorded during the surgical procedure using surface electromyography (EMG; TrignoTM, Delsys, Inc., Boston, MA). The maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) was obtained to normalize muscle effort as %MVC. The median frequency (MDF) was calculated to assess muscle fatigue. Each surgeon also completed the validated Piper Fatigue Scale-12 (PFH-12) before and after the procedure for self-reported fatigue assessment. The PFS-12 has four subscales (behavior, affective, sensory, and cognitive), and a total 10-scale score, with 0 meaning no fatigue. Statistical analysis was done using SPSS v23.0, with α=0.05.

Results: 25 surgeries were recorded (LAP: N=18, RA: N=7). EMG analysis revealed that the RA group had a significant increase in mean muscle activation for the anterior deltoid (LAP: 2.44±1.81%, RA: 3.22±2.45%; p=0.018). Conversely, LAP required more effort for the extensor digitorum, represented by a significantly lower MDF compared to the RA group (LAP: 91.29±20.30Hz; RA: 102.57±14.25Hz, p=0.049). No significant differences were seen between approaches in upper trapezius and flexor carpi radialis activation. Survey analysis revealed no differences in self-reported fatigue before and after the surgery in LAP (preoperative: 2.60±1.49, postoperative: 2.91±1.11, p=0.322) and RA (preoperative: 2.33±1.47, postoperative: 2.77±1.25, p=0.132). There were also no significant differences between the two approaches, p=0.869. A significant increase in self-reported fatigue for the behavior subscale was seen after the surgery for both approaches (preoperatively: 2.17±1.27; postoperatively: 2.62±1.17, p=0.018).

Conclusions: Our analysis showed that different muscle groups are preferentially activated in the performance of LAP and RA. Performing robotic surgery utilizes more shoulder muscles whereas laparoscopic surgeries require increased forearm activation. However, no difference was observed in self-reported fatigue between the two groups. The difference in muscle activation between RA and LAP could be a driving force to shape the ergonomic design of the surgical tools and systems in the operating room. Our future studies will include the assessment of back and neck muscle activation to determine the impact of surgical approach on these muscle groups. 


Presented at the SAGES 2017 Annual Meeting in Houston, TX.

Abstract ID: 87004

Program Number: S107

Presentation Session: Diversity and Innovation Session

Presentation Type: Podium

68

Share this:

  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window) Pocket
  • Click to share on Mastodon (Opens in new window) Mastodon
  • Click to share on Threads (Opens in new window) Threads
  • Click to share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky

Related


sages_adbutler_leaderboard

Hours & Info

11300 West Olympic Blvd, Suite 600
Los Angeles, CA 90064

1-310-437-0544

[email protected]

Monday – Friday
8am to 5pm Pacific Time

Find Us Around the Web!

  • Bluesky
  • X
  • Instagram
  • Facebook
  • YouTube

Copyright © 2025 · SAGES · All Rights Reserved

Important Links

Healthy Sooner: Patient Information

SAGES Guidelines, Statements, & Standards of Practice

SAGES Manuals