• Skip to main content
  • Skip to header right navigation
  • Skip to site footer

Log in
  • Search
    • Search All SAGES Content
    • Search SAGES Guidelines
    • Search the Video Library
    • Search the Image Library
    • Search the Abstracts Archive
www.sages.org

SAGES

Reimagining surgical care for a healthier world

  • Home
    • Search
    • SAGES Home
    • SAGES Foundation Home
  • About
    • Awards
    • Who Is SAGES?
    • Leadership
    • Our Mission
    • Advocacy
    • Committees
      • SAGES Board of Governors
      • Officers and Representatives of the Society
      • Committee Chairs and Co-Chairs
      • Committee Rosters
      • SAGES Past Presidents
  • Meetings
    • SAGES NBT Innovation Weekend
    • SAGES Annual Meeting
      • 2026 Scientific Session Call for Abstracts
      • 2026 Emerging Technology Call for Abstracts
    • CME Claim Form
    • SAGES Past, Present, Future, and Related Meeting Information
    • SAGES Related Meetings & Events Calendar
  • Join SAGES!
    • Membership Application
    • Membership Benefits
    • Membership Types
      • Requirements and Applications for Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Affiliate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Associate Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Candidate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for International Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements for Medical Student Membership
    • Member Spotlight
    • Give the Gift of SAGES Membership
  • Patients
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Healthy Sooner – Patient Information for Minimally Invasive Surgery
    • Choosing Wisely – An Initiative of the ABIM Foundation
    • All in the Recovery: Colorectal Cancer Alliance
    • Find A SAGES Surgeon
  • Publications
    • Clinical / Practice / Training Guidelines, Statements, and Standards of Practice
    • Sustainability in Surgical Practice
    • SAGES Stories Podcast
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Patient Information From SAGES
    • TAVAC – Technology and Value Assessments
    • Surgical Endoscopy and Other Journal Information
    • SAGES Manuals
    • MesSAGES – The SAGES Newsletter
    • COVID-19 Archive
    • Troubleshooting Guides
  • Education
    • Wellness Resources – You Are Not Alone
    • Avoid Opiates After Surgery
    • SAGES Subscription Catalog
    • SAGES TV: Home of SAGES Surgical Videos
    • The SAGES Safe Cholecystectomy Program
    • Masters Program
    • Resident and Fellow Opportunities
      • MIS Fellows Course
      • SAGES Robotics Residents and Fellows Courses
      • SAGES Free Resident Webinar Series
      • Fluorescence-Guided Surgery Course for Fellows
      • Fellows’ Career Development Course
    • SAGES S.M.A.R.T. Enhanced Recovery Program
    • SAGES @ Cine-Med Products
      • SAGES Top 21 Minimally Invasive Procedures Every Practicing Surgeon Should Know
      • SAGES Pearls Step-by-Step
      • SAGES Flexible Endoscopy 101
    • SAGES OR SAFETY Video Activity
  • Opportunities
    • Fellowship Recognition Opportunities
    • SAGES Advanced Flexible Endoscopy Area of Concentrated Training (ACT) SEAL
    • Multi-Society Foregut Fellowship Certification
    • Research Opportunities
    • FLS
    • FES
    • FUSE
    • Jobs Board
    • SAGES Go Global: Global Affairs and Humanitarian Efforts
  • OWLS/FLS
You are here: Home / Abstracts / Endoluminal Vacuum Therapy for Ivor-Lewis Anastomatic Leaks: A Pilot Study in a Swine Model

Endoluminal Vacuum Therapy for Ivor-Lewis Anastomatic Leaks: A Pilot Study in a Swine Model

Rachel B Scott, DO, Laura H Rosenberger, MD, Lane A Ritter, MD, Amber L Shada, MD, Sanford H Feldman, DVM, PhD, Mark J Mentrikoski, MD, Daniel E Kleiner, MD. Western Connecticut Health Network, Department of Surgery; University of Virginia Health System, Department of Surgery.

Objective of the technology or device

Our study looked at the feasibility of healing a large leak from within an esophagogastric anastomosis utilizing an endoluminal negative pressure device (endoluminal wound vac) in a swine Ivor-Lewis model.  The device was designed to prevent the formation of anastomotic leaks in high-risk patients as well as heal leaks which had already formed.  This would in turn reduce leak-related morbidity such as mediastinitis, prolonged sepsis and subsequent respiratory failure.  Our secondary endpoint was to evaluate the mucosal integrity and inflammation at the leak site following device placement, which if present could possibly lead to future complications.  

Description of the technology and method of its use and application

The device was constructed utilizing a dual chamber sump negative pressure system. Open pore foam was wrapped circumferentially around two, 16-French sump tubes.  One tube extended proximally and distally from the open pore foam to divert saliva and gastric secretions while the second tube applied negative pressure to the foam (Figure 1).  The placement of the device was performed after an intentional one centimeter defect was created across the esophagogastric anastomosis.  The endoluminal wound vac pressure was kept at 75mmHg for seven days.  After this time, the endoluminal device was removed and the pigs underwent fluoroscopy and subsequent necropsy to evaluate for presence and/or extent of anastomotic closure.

Preliminary Results

We conducted a non-randomized, controlled trial in a swine model to test the utilization of endoluminal negative pressure therapy in closing anastomotic leaks following an Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy.

Four pigs had the experimental endoluminal negative pressure device placed. All four experimental pigs had complete closure of the leak on postmortem fluoroscopy and necropsy.  

A total of six pigs were placed into the control group where an intentional one centimeter defect was created at the esophagogastric anastomosis without any device placement.  Three pigs died within the first twenty-four hours, likely due to presumed cardiac arrhythmia or respiratory failure.   All six control pigs had a leak on fluoroscopy and necropsy. 

Conclusions/Further Directions

With this study we have demonstrated that endoluminal negative pressure therapy is well-tolerated in a swine Ivor-Lewis model.  This therapy was successful in closing anastomotic defects in 100% of cases with a p-value 0.0048 using Fisher’s exact test including all six control pigs.  The p-value when using only the three control pigs that survived is still significant at 0.0286.  Despite the small population, the leak rate was significantly lower with use of the endoluminal device, which could possibly lead to decreased morbidity including decreased length of stay in the hospital.  Larger studies are warranted for additional evaluation, and safety and efficacy trials of this device in human clinical trials are warranted.

Figure 1.

 

View Poster

732

Share this:

  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window) Pocket
  • Click to share on Mastodon (Opens in new window) Mastodon
  • Click to share on Threads (Opens in new window) Threads
  • Click to share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky

Related


sages_adbutler_leaderboard

Hours & Info

11300 West Olympic Blvd, Suite 600
Los Angeles, CA 90064

1-310-437-0544

[email protected]

Monday – Friday
8am to 5pm Pacific Time

Find Us Around the Web!

  • Bluesky
  • X
  • Instagram
  • Facebook
  • YouTube

Copyright © 2025 · SAGES · All Rights Reserved

Important Links

Healthy Sooner: Patient Information

SAGES Guidelines, Statements, & Standards of Practice

SAGES Manuals