• Skip to main content
  • Skip to header right navigation
  • Skip to site footer

Log in
  • Search
    • Search All SAGES Content
    • Search SAGES Guidelines
    • Search the Video Library
    • Search the Image Library
    • Search the Abstracts Archive
www.sages.org

SAGES

Reimagining surgical care for a healthier world

  • Home
    • Search
    • SAGES Home
    • SAGES Foundation Home
  • About
    • Awards
    • Who Is SAGES?
    • Leadership
    • Our Mission
    • Advocacy
    • Committees
      • SAGES Board of Governors
      • Officers and Representatives of the Society
      • Committee Chairs and Co-Chairs
      • Committee Rosters
      • SAGES Past Presidents
  • Meetings
    • SAGES NBT Innovation Weekend
    • SAGES Annual Meeting
      • 2026 Scientific Session Call for Abstracts
      • 2026 Emerging Technology Call for Abstracts
    • CME Claim Form
    • SAGES Past, Present, Future, and Related Meeting Information
    • SAGES Related Meetings & Events Calendar
  • Join SAGES!
    • Membership Application
    • Membership Benefits
    • Membership Types
      • Requirements and Applications for Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Affiliate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Associate Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Candidate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for International Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements for Medical Student Membership
    • Member Spotlight
    • Give the Gift of SAGES Membership
  • Patients
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Healthy Sooner – Patient Information for Minimally Invasive Surgery
    • Choosing Wisely – An Initiative of the ABIM Foundation
    • All in the Recovery: Colorectal Cancer Alliance
    • Find A SAGES Surgeon
  • Publications
    • Clinical / Practice / Training Guidelines, Statements, and Standards of Practice
    • Sustainability in Surgical Practice
    • SAGES Stories Podcast
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Patient Information From SAGES
    • TAVAC – Technology and Value Assessments
    • Surgical Endoscopy and Other Journal Information
    • SAGES Manuals
    • MesSAGES – The SAGES Newsletter
    • COVID-19 Archive
    • Troubleshooting Guides
  • Education
    • Wellness Resources – You Are Not Alone
    • Avoid Opiates After Surgery
    • SAGES Subscription Catalog
    • SAGES TV: Home of SAGES Surgical Videos
    • The SAGES Safe Cholecystectomy Program
    • Masters Program
    • Resident and Fellow Opportunities
      • MIS Fellows Course
      • SAGES Robotics Residents and Fellows Courses
      • SAGES Free Resident Webinar Series
      • Fluorescence-Guided Surgery Course for Fellows
      • Fellows’ Career Development Course
    • SAGES S.M.A.R.T. Enhanced Recovery Program
    • SAGES @ Cine-Med Products
      • SAGES Top 21 Minimally Invasive Procedures Every Practicing Surgeon Should Know
      • SAGES Pearls Step-by-Step
      • SAGES Flexible Endoscopy 101
    • SAGES OR SAFETY Video Activity
  • Opportunities
    • Fellowship Recognition Opportunities
    • SAGES Advanced Flexible Endoscopy Area of Concentrated Training (ACT) SEAL
    • Multi-Society Foregut Fellowship Certification
    • Research Opportunities
    • FLS
    • FES
    • FUSE
    • Jobs Board
    • SAGES Go Global: Global Affairs and Humanitarian Efforts
  • OWLS/FLS
You are here: Home / Abstracts / DOES SELECTIVE USE OF HEPATOBILIARY SCINTIGRAPHY (HIDA) SCAN FOR DIAGNOSIS OF ACUTE CHOLECYSTITIS, FOLLOWING EQUIVOCAL NON-DIAGNOSTIC GALLBLADDER ULTRASONOGRAPHY, AFFECT OUTCOMES

DOES SELECTIVE USE OF HEPATOBILIARY SCINTIGRAPHY (HIDA) SCAN FOR DIAGNOSIS OF ACUTE CHOLECYSTITIS, FOLLOWING EQUIVOCAL NON-DIAGNOSTIC GALLBLADDER ULTRASONOGRAPHY, AFFECT OUTCOMES

Fahad Ali, BA, Amir Aryaie, MD, Eneko Larumbe, PhD, Mark Williams, MD, Edwin Onkendi, MD. Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center

Introduction: Acute cholecystitis (AC) is diagnosed by characteristic gallbladder ultrasonographic findings (high specificity, low sensitivity). Hepatobiliary scintigraphy (HIDA) may be needed to confirm AC (higher sensitivity and specificity). The aim of this study was to assess the impact of the current selective use of HIDA scan for sonographically equivocal cases of AC on outcomes

Methods: A retrospective chart review of patients treated for AC at our institution (1/2015 to 12/2016) was performed. Patients were divided into 2 groups: the Ultrasound Only group (US-only) and the Ultrasound-HIDA group (US-HIDA). Timing of US and HIDA, and intervention for AC since presentation to emergency room (ER), and their impact on outcomes were analyzed. AC severity was graded per the TG3-Tokyo guidelines.

Results: A total of 110 patients were analyzed. The 2 groups were statistically similar with regards to age, body mass index, ASA class II, III and IV, extent of leukocytosis at presentation and liver functions test levels at presentation. In the US-only group, diagnostic ultrasound was obtained sooner, [median of 3 (interquartile range, IQR 1.3-8.7) hours] from presentation to the ER compared to the US-HIDA group, [10.9 (IQR 3.6-40.6) hours], p=0.007. HIDA was obtained after a median delay of 11.5 (IQR 3.7-25) hours from a non-diagnostic ultrasound. Majority of patients (87%) in the US-only group had mild (TG3 grade I) to moderate (TG3 grade II) AC, while 78% of the US-HIDA group had moderate (TG3 grade II) to severe (TG3 grade III) AC (p=0.003). Despite this, more patients in the US-HIDA group (39%) had a “normal” non-diagnostic ultrasound compared to the US-only group (4.3%), p<0.001. Seven patients in the US-HIDA group had no intervention due to normal HIDA scan (2), AC misdiagnosis due to liver cirrhosis (1), and severe medical comorbidities (4). More patients (74%) in the US-only group underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy, compared to 39% in the US-HIDA group (p=0.006). Between the two groups, there was no significant differences in 90-day morbidity, mortality and reoperations. However, the length of stay was longer by a median of 3.5 days in the US-HIDA group (p=0.003).

Conclusion: Patients with moderate to severe AC are more likely to need HIDA scan due to a “normal” non-diagnostic ultrasound, have a delay in diagnosis, not have intervention for AC due to severe medical comorbidities and have lower chance of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The length of hospital stay is significantly longer for these patient by a median of 3.5 days.  


Presented at the SAGES 2017 Annual Meeting in Houston, TX.

Abstract ID: 87091

Program Number: P094

Presentation Session: iPoster Session (Non CME)

Presentation Type: Poster

570

Share this:

  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window) Pocket
  • Click to share on Mastodon (Opens in new window) Mastodon
  • Click to share on Threads (Opens in new window) Threads
  • Click to share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky

Related


sages_adbutler_leaderboard

Hours & Info

11300 West Olympic Blvd, Suite 600
Los Angeles, CA 90064

1-310-437-0544

[email protected]

Monday – Friday
8am to 5pm Pacific Time

Find Us Around the Web!

  • Bluesky
  • X
  • Instagram
  • Facebook
  • YouTube

Copyright © 2025 · SAGES · All Rights Reserved

Important Links

Healthy Sooner: Patient Information

SAGES Guidelines, Statements, & Standards of Practice

SAGES Manuals