• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

SAGES

Reimagining surgical care for a healthier world

  • Home
    • COVID-19 Annoucements
    • Search
    • SAGES Home
    • SAGES Foundation Home
  • About
    • Who is SAGES?
    • SAGES Mission Statement
    • Advocacy
    • Strategic Plan, 2020-2023
    • Committees
      • Request to Join a SAGES Committee
      • SAGES Board of Governors
      • Officers and Representatives of the Society
      • Committee Chairs and Co-Chairs
      • Full Committee Rosters
      • SAGES Past Presidents
    • Donate to the SAGES Foundation
    • Awards
      • George Berci Award
      • Pioneer in Surgical Endoscopy
      • Excellence In Clinical Care
      • International Ambassador
      • IRCAD Visiting Fellowship
      • Social Justice and Health Equity
      • Excellence in Community Surgery
      • Distinguished Service
      • Early Career Researcher
      • Researcher in Training
      • Jeff Ponsky Master Educator
      • Excellence in Medical Leadership
      • Barbara Berci Memorial Award
      • Brandeis Scholarship
      • Advocacy Summit
      • RAFT Annual Meeting Abstract Contest and Awards
  • Meetings
    • NBT Innovation Weekend
    • SAGES Annual Meeting
      • 2023 Scientific Session Call For Abstracts
      • 2023 Emerging Technology Call For Abstracts
    • CME Claim Form
    • Industry
      • Advertising Opportunities
      • Exhibit Opportunities
      • Sponsorship Opportunities
    • Future Meetings
    • Past Meetings
      • SAGES 2022
      • SAGES 2021
    • Related Meetings Calendar
  • Join SAGES!
    • Membership Benefits
    • Membership Applications
      • Active Membership
      • Affiliate Membership
      • Associate Active Membership
      • Candidate Membership
      • International Membership
      • Medical Student Membership
    • Member News
      • Member Spotlight
      • Give the Gift of SAGES Membership
  • Patients
    • Healthy Sooner – Patient Information for Minimally Invasive Surgery
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Choosing Wisely – An Initiative of the ABIM Foundation
    • All in the Recovery: Colorectal Cancer Alliance
    • Find a SAGES Member
  • Publications
    • SAGES Stories Podcast
    • SAGES Clinical / Practice / Training Guidelines, Statements, and Standards of Practice
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • TAVAC – Technology and Value Assessments
    • Surgical Endoscopy and Other Journal Information
    • SAGES Manuals
    • SCOPE – The SAGES Newsletter
    • COVID-19 Annoucements
    • Troubleshooting Guides
  • Education
    • OpiVoid.org
    • SAGES.TV Video Library
    • Safe Cholecystectomy Program
      • Safe Cholecystectomy Didactic Modules
    • Masters Program
      • SAGES Facebook Program Collaboratives
      • Acute Care Surgery
      • Bariatric
      • Biliary
      • Colorectal
      • Flexible Endoscopy (upper or lower)
      • Foregut
      • Hernia
      • Robotics
    • Educational Opportunities
    • HPB/Solid Organ Program
    • Courses for Residents
      • Advanced Courses
      • Basic Courses
    • Video Based Assessments (VBA)
    • Robotics Fellows Course
    • MIS Fellows Course
    • Facebook Livestreams
    • Free Webinars For Residents
    • SMART Enhanced Recovery Program
    • SAGES OR SAFETY Video
    • SAGES at Cine-Med
      • SAGES Top 21 MIS Procedures
      • SAGES Pearls
      • SAGES Flexible Endoscopy 101
      • SAGES Tips & Tricks of the Top 21
  • Opportunities
    • NEW-Area of Concentrated Training Seal (ACT)-Advanced Flexible Endoscopy-Coming Soon!
    • SAGES Fellowship Certification for Advanced GI MIS and Comprehensive Flexible Endoscopy
    • Multi-Society Foregut Fellowship Certification
    • SAGES Research Opportunities
    • Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery
    • Fundamentals of Endoscopic Surgery
    • Fundamental Use of Surgical Energy
    • Job Board
    • SAGES Go Global: Global Affairs and Humanitarian Efforts
  • Search
    • Search All SAGES Content
    • Search SAGES Guidelines
    • Search the Video Library
    • Search the Image Library
    • Search the Abstracts Archive
  • Store
    • “Unofficial” Logo Products
  • Log In

Device related complications of gastric electric stimulation frequently necessitate re-operation

Andrew T Strong, MD1, Ivy N Haskins, MD1, Matthew Davis, MD1, Kevin El-Hayek, MD1, Michael S Cline, DO2, Matthew Kroh, MD1, John H Rodriguez, MD1. 1Section of Surgical Endoscopy, Dept of General Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, 2Department of Gastroenterology, Cleveland Clinic

Introduction: Gastric electric stimulation (GES) has been an option for patients with medically refractory gastroparesis for more than 15 years. Prior to implantation, patients are counseled that devices will need to be periodically exchanged for battery depletion and could be removed if infection or erosion of the device or leads develops. However, additional indications for re-intervention exist.

Methods: Demographic and operative information is prospectively collected at our institution for all patients undergoing GES therapy with Enterra® or Enterra2® (Medtronic, Dublin, Ireland) as a humanitarian use device. Patients who had undergone local revision, or had part or all of the GES system replaced since initial implantation from January 2002 to July 2016 were retrospectively identified. Patients were excluded if battery depletion was the only indication for reoperation. Operative and 30 day follow up information was collected.

Results: A total of 209 patients received GES therapy at our institution during the study period. There were 44 (21.1%) patients who had reoperations for GES revision or replacement; 8 of these patients had reoperation for battery depletion only and were thus excluded from our analysis. A total of 36 (17.2%) patients remained. This cohort had a median age of 53.9 years (IQR 31.2-48.3) and average BMI of 24.6 +/- 4.5 kg/m2 at the time of GES insertion. Eleven patients had diabetic gastroparesis and 25 patients had idiopathic gastroparesis. A total of 55 reoperations were performed in these 36 patients. The median time to first surgical intervention was 16.9 months. The median number of re-operations was 1 (range 1-4). There were 26 devices were replaced (47.2%), most commonly for unspecified device failure (n=9, 16.4%), followed by perceived shocking sensation (n=5, 9.1%) and lead failure/fracture (n=3, 5.4%).

Twenty-one generators (31.8%) were revised in place, most commonly for generator flipping or migration along the abdominal wall (n=14, 25.4%), followed by erosion or infection (n=3, 5.4%). In eight patients device explant was their final operation. There were no intraoperative complications. Complications after re-intervention included seroma formation in 6 patients (10.9%), gastrointestinal bleeding in 2 patients (3.6%), 1 superficial wound infection (1.8%) and 1 organ space infection (1.8%) requiring reoperation.

Conclusion: GES is shown to be effective for patients with both idiopathic and diabetic gastroparesis. GES device related complications needing re-intervention may occur more frequently than previously reported, and may represent a potentially significant burden for patients.


Presented at the SAGES 2017 Annual Meeting in Houston, TX.

Abstract ID: 80024

Program Number: P008

Presentation Session: Poster of Distinction (Non CME)

Presentation Type: PDIST

40

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Pinterest
  • WhatsApp
  • Reddit

Related

« Return to SAGES 2017 abstract archive

Our Mission

Innovate, educate and collaborate to improve patient care.

Recently, on SAGES…

Critical View of Safety (CVS) Challenge QR Code

The SAGES Critical View of Safety Challenge – Donate Your Lap Chole Videos!

The Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons is hosting the first Artificial Intelligence Data Challenge conducted by surgeons. The aim of this challenge is to generate a large and diverse dataset of laparoscopic cholecystectomy videos, annotated with respect to the subcomponents of the Critical View of Safety (CVS). Computer scientists from all over the […]

Respuesta de SAGES al Estudio NordICC sobre el beneficio de las colonoscopias de detección

SAGES desea aclarar los resultados del estudio NordICC y colocarlos en contexto de los esfuerzos de varias agencias nacionales para reducir el riesgo de cáncer colorrectal – la segunda causa de muerte por cáncer más frecuente en los Estados Unidos-, mediante la promoción de la detección y tratamiento oportuno de las lesiones.

SAGES Response to NordICC Study Regarding Benefit of Screening Colonoscopies

The NordICC Study recently published in The New England Journal of Medicine and widely reported on by media outlets has raised questions regarding the benefit of screening colonoscopy in lowering the risk of colorectal cancer and cancer-related deaths among otherwise healthy and symptom-free men and women aged 55 to 64. Provocative headlines and commentaries have […]

Contact SAGES

Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons
11300 W. Olympic Blvd Suite 600
Los Angeles, CA 90064 USA
webmaster@sages.org
Tel: (310) 437-0544

Find Us Around the Web!

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Important Links

SAGES 2023 Meeting Information

Healthy Sooner: Patient Information

SAGES Guidelines, Statements, & Standards of Practice

SAGES Manuals

 

  • taTME Study Info
  • Foundation
  • SAGES.TV
  • MyCME
  • Educational Activities

Copyright © 2023 Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons