• Skip to main content
  • Skip to header right navigation
  • Skip to site footer

Log in
  • Search
    • Search All SAGES Content
    • Search SAGES Guidelines
    • Search the Video Library
    • Search the Image Library
    • Search the Abstracts Archive
www.sages.org

SAGES

Reimagining surgical care for a healthier world

  • Home
    • Search
    • SAGES Home
    • SAGES Foundation Home
  • About
    • Awards
    • Who Is SAGES?
    • Leadership
    • Our Mission
    • Advocacy
    • Committees
      • SAGES Board of Governors
      • Officers and Representatives of the Society
      • Committee Chairs and Co-Chairs
      • Committee Rosters
      • SAGES Past Presidents
  • Meetings
    • SAGES NBT Innovation Weekend
    • SAGES Annual Meeting
      • 2026 Scientific Session Call for Abstracts
      • 2026 Emerging Technology Call for Abstracts
    • CME Claim Form
    • SAGES Past, Present, Future, and Related Meeting Information
    • SAGES Related Meetings & Events Calendar
  • Join SAGES!
    • Membership Application
    • Membership Benefits
    • Membership Types
      • Requirements and Applications for Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Affiliate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Associate Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Candidate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for International Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements for Medical Student Membership
    • Member Spotlight
    • Give the Gift of SAGES Membership
  • Patients
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Healthy Sooner – Patient Information for Minimally Invasive Surgery
    • Choosing Wisely – An Initiative of the ABIM Foundation
    • All in the Recovery: Colorectal Cancer Alliance
    • Find A SAGES Surgeon
  • Publications
    • Clinical / Practice / Training Guidelines, Statements, and Standards of Practice
    • Sustainability in Surgical Practice
    • SAGES Stories Podcast
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Patient Information From SAGES
    • TAVAC – Technology and Value Assessments
    • Surgical Endoscopy and Other Journal Information
    • SAGES Manuals
    • MesSAGES – The SAGES Newsletter
    • COVID-19 Archive
    • Troubleshooting Guides
  • Education
    • Wellness Resources – You Are Not Alone
    • Avoid Opiates After Surgery
    • SAGES Subscription Catalog
    • SAGES TV: Home of SAGES Surgical Videos
    • The SAGES Safe Cholecystectomy Program
    • Masters Program
    • Resident and Fellow Opportunities
      • MIS Fellows Course
      • SAGES Robotics Residents and Fellows Courses
      • SAGES Free Resident Webinar Series
      • Fluorescence-Guided Surgery Course for Fellows
      • Fellows’ Career Development Course
    • SAGES S.M.A.R.T. Enhanced Recovery Program
    • SAGES @ Cine-Med Products
      • SAGES Top 21 Minimally Invasive Procedures Every Practicing Surgeon Should Know
      • SAGES Pearls Step-by-Step
      • SAGES Flexible Endoscopy 101
    • SAGES OR SAFETY Video Activity
  • Opportunities
    • Fellowship Recognition Opportunities
    • SAGES Advanced Flexible Endoscopy Area of Concentrated Training (ACT) SEAL
    • Multi-Society Foregut Fellowship Certification
    • Research Opportunities
    • FLS
    • FES
    • FUSE
    • Jobs Board
    • SAGES Go Global: Global Affairs and Humanitarian Efforts
  • OWLS/FLS
You are here: Home / Abstracts / Demonstration of Variability in Excess Weight Loss Calculation Using Different Baseline Weights

Demonstration of Variability in Excess Weight Loss Calculation Using Different Baseline Weights

Roshni Venugopal, MD, Karina A Newhall, MD, Julia E Segal, BS, Thadeus L Trus, MD, William S Laycock. Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center

Background: In the era of quality surveillance and measurement, reporting of clinical outcomes are not standardized. One of the most important reported measures in bariatric surgery is “Percent Excess Weight Loss” or %EWL, calculated from the difference between a patient’s “baseline weight” and “ideal body weight” or IBW.

Hypothesis: As bariatric programs determine when to identify the baseline weight of their patients, we expect this value is variable across programs. We hypothesize that lack of a standard definition for baseline weight can lead to significant differences in %EWL calculation. Our objective is to demonstrate this variability by utilizing different baseline weights to calculate %EWL in our patient subset.

Methods: A random sample of 60 patients was selected from bariatric patients who underwent laparoscopic Roux-n-Y gastric bypass or laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy from January 2012 through December 2012 at Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center. Patients lost to follow-up at 1 year and patients who became pregnant were excluded. %EWL at 1month and 1year was calculated using three baseline weights: first preoperative visit (PRE1), second preoperative visit (PRE2), and day of surgery (DOS). Paired t-tests were used to compare %EWL calculations at binary time points.

Results:

Average %Excess Weight Loss at PRE1, PRE2, and DOS at 1month and at 1year after laparoscopic bariatric surgery

Time after Surgery %EWL PRE1 %EWL PRE2 %EWL DOS
1 month 23.70% 22.02% 15.17%
1 year 59.11% 58.36% 54.63%

At 1 month: DOS versus PRE1 (p<0.0001); DOS versus PRE2 (p<0.001).

At 1 year: DOS versus PRE1 (p<0.0001); DOS versus PRE2 (p<0.0001).

Conclusion: Given the emerging need to compare and contrast clinical outcomes across geographic locations, amongst health care institutions, and between health care providers, it is important to standardize outcomes accounting methodology. We have shown that calculating %EWL within our patient sample using different baseline weights yields significantly different results. This reflects the variability that may occur from program to program. We advocate utilizing the earliest preoperative patient weight at entry into the clinical bariatric program as the baseline patient weight because we feel this will most accurately reflect the impact of interaction with a surgical weight loss program on clinical weight loss outcomes.


Presented at the SAGES 2017 Annual Meeting in Houston, TX.

Abstract ID: 80803

Program Number: P637

Presentation Session: Poster (Non CME)

Presentation Type: Poster

78

Share this:

  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window) Pocket
  • Click to share on Mastodon (Opens in new window) Mastodon
  • Click to share on Threads (Opens in new window) Threads
  • Click to share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky

Related


sages_adbutler_leaderboard

Hours & Info

11300 West Olympic Blvd, Suite 600
Los Angeles, CA 90064

1-310-437-0544

[email protected]

Monday – Friday
8am to 5pm Pacific Time

Find Us Around the Web!

  • Bluesky
  • X
  • Instagram
  • Facebook
  • YouTube

Copyright © 2025 · SAGES · All Rights Reserved

Important Links

Healthy Sooner: Patient Information

SAGES Guidelines, Statements, & Standards of Practice

SAGES Manuals