• Skip to main content
  • Skip to header right navigation
  • Skip to site footer

Log in
www.sages.org

SAGES

Reimagining surgical care for a healthier world

  • Home
    • SAGES Home
    • SAGES Foundation Home
  • About
    • Awards
    • Who Is SAGES?
    • Leadership
    • Our Mission
    • Advocacy
    • Committees
      • SAGES Board of Governors
      • Officers and Representatives of the Society
      • Committee Chairs and Co-Chairs
      • Committee Rosters
      • SAGES Past Presidents
    • Why Should You Support SAGES?
    • SAGES Swag
  • Meetings
    • SAGES NBT Innovation Weekend
    • SAGES Annual Meeting
      • 2026 Annual Meeting
      • 2027 Scientific Session Call for Abstracts
      • 2027 Emerging Technology Call for Abstracts
    • CME Claim Form
    • SAGES Past, Present, Future, and Related Meeting Information
    • SAGES Related Meetings & Events Calendar
  • Join SAGES!
    • Membership Application
    • Membership Benefits
    • Membership Types
      • Requirements and Applications for Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Affiliate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Associate Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Candidate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for International Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements for Medical Student Membership
    • Member Spotlight
    • Give the Gift of SAGES Membership
  • Patients
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Healthy Sooner – Patient Information for Minimally Invasive Surgery
    • Choosing Wisely – An Initiative of the ABIM Foundation
    • All in the Recovery: Colorectal Cancer Alliance
    • Find A SAGES Surgeon
  • Publications
    • Clinical / Practice / Training Guidelines, Statements, and Standards of Practice
    • Sustainability in Surgical Practice
    • SAGES Stories Podcast
    • SAGES Lead Up Podcast
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Patient Information From SAGES
    • TAVAC – Technology and Value Assessments
    • Surgical Endoscopy and Other Journal Information
    • Innovative Surgical Trends
    • SAGES Manuals
    • MesSAGES – The SAGES Newsletter
    • COVID-19 Archive
    • Troubleshooting Guides
  • Education
    • Wellness Resources – You Are Not Alone
    • Avoid Opiates After Surgery
    • SAGES Subscription Catalog
    • SAGES TV: Home of SAGES Surgical Videos
    • The SAGES Safe Cholecystectomy Program
    • Masters Program
    • Resident and Fellow Opportunities
      • MIS Fellows Course
      • SAGES Robotics Residents and Fellows Courses
      • SAGES Free Resident Webinar Series
      • Advanced Laparoscopy and Fluorescence-Guided Surgery Course for Fellows
      • Fellows’ Career Development Course
    • SAGES S.M.A.R.T. Enhanced Recovery Program
    • SAGES @ Cine-Med Products
      • SAGES Top 21 Minimally Invasive Procedures Every Practicing Surgeon Should Know
      • SAGES Pearls Step-by-Step
      • SAGES Flexible Endoscopy 101
    • SAGES OR SAFETY Video Activity
    • Foregut Video Atlas
  • Opportunities
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Fellowship Recognition Opportunities
    • SAGES Advanced Flexible Endoscopy Area of Concentrated Training (ACT) SEAL
    • Multi-Society Foregut Fellowship Certification
    • Research Opportunities
    • FLS
    • FES
    • FUSE
    • Jobs Board
    • SAGES Go Global: Global Affairs
  • Learning Hub
You are here: Home / Abstracts / Complete Laparoscopic R-y Recostruction With Hunt-laurence Pouch in Total Gastrectomy

Complete Laparoscopic R-y Recostruction With Hunt-laurence Pouch in Total Gastrectomy

Koji Hattori, MDPhD, Kazunao Watanabe, MD, Hidemitsu Ogino, MD, Rai Shimoyama, MD, Jun Kawachi, MD, Hiromitsu Takeyama, MDPhD. Shonan Kamakura General Hospital

 

Objectives
Since 2004, after open total gastrectomy(OTG), we have included a Hunt-Lawrence pouch formation in Roux en Y reconstruction protocol (PRY), in order to increase the amount of meal to be taken once. And since 2007, we had performed the PRY in laparoscopically assisted total gastrectomy(LATG) in 16 cases and we presented these reconstruction method and these results. However, at this point, the LATG-PRY method took longer operation time and had to make a mini open incision of 6cm long and made many staplers. So, in order to resolve these problems, since 2009 we tried to improve our LATG-PRY method in 8 cases and reduced reconstruction time by the complete laparoscopic reconstruction. In the present study, we propose a protocol to overcome the technical weak points encountered during the former PRY procedures in LATG. Furthermore, some comparisons were made with those in case of former LATG-PRY and LATG-RY.
Methods
The former procedures of PRY : Skin incision of 6 cm-length was made at the midline of epigastric region. Jejunum was pull out through incision, formed an inverted J-shaped pouch of 15 cm-long or a Y-shaped anastomosis , and then it was placed back into the abdominal cavity each other. The pouch was anastomosed with a circular stapler to the esophagus under direct vision through the 6cm midline incision .
The new procedures of PRY : All reconstructive procedures were performed under laparoscope. At the first the transvers mesocolon was opened in order to pull out the jejunum through the the hole. The jejunum at 30cm from Treitz lig.was cut. The Y-shaped anastomosis was formed with a linear stapler and its entry hole was closed by suture. An inverted J-shaped pouch of 15 cm-long was formed and was anastomosed to the esophagus with a linear stapler and its entry hole was closed by suture.
Results
Operation time : Average operation time of the former procedures(16cases) was 78 minutes and one of the new procedures(8cases) was 65 minutes.
Hospital stay: The average length of hospital stay after surgeries was 6.0 days in the former procedures and 6.1 days in the new procedures.
Amount of meals: The average amount of meals the patients could take per once in six months after the surgeries were 78.0% in the former procedures and 75.0% in the new procedures. So between the former procedures and the new ones, there were no differences in amount. The amount of meals the patient of both pouch methods could take were twice as much the patient of LATG-RY method(37.5%) could take.
In the methods presented here, no severe complications such as anastomotic stenosis or leakage were encountered, indicating that these methods are safe and practical.
Conclusion / Perspective
With the new procedures of LATG-PRY we had no handles through the mini-open incision. Therefore we had less stress under these operations and could reduce the average operation time by 13minutes.
 


Session Number: Poster – Poster Presentations
Program Number: P197
View Poster

Related



Hours & Info

15821 Ventura Blvd Ste 400
Encino, CA 91436

1-310-437-0544

[email protected]

Monday – Friday
8am to 5pm Pacific Time

Find Us Around the Web!

  • Bluesky
  • X
  • Instagram
  • Facebook
  • YouTube

Copyright © 2026 · SAGES · All Rights Reserved

Important Links

Healthy Sooner: Patient Information

SAGES Guidelines, Statements, & Standards of Practice

SAGES Manuals

Refine Search