• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

SAGES

Reimagining surgical care for a healthier world

  • Home
    • COVID-19 Annoucements
    • Search
    • SAGES Home
    • SAGES Foundation Home
  • About
    • Who is SAGES?
    • SAGES Mission Statement
    • Advocacy
    • Strategic Plan, 2020-2023
    • Committees
      • Request to Join a SAGES Committee
      • SAGES Board of Governors
      • Officers and Representatives of the Society
      • Committee Chairs and Co-Chairs
      • Full Committee Rosters
      • SAGES Past Presidents
    • Donate to the SAGES Foundation
    • Awards
      • George Berci Award
      • Pioneer in Surgical Endoscopy
      • Excellence In Clinical Care
      • International Ambassador
      • IRCAD Visiting Fellowship
      • Social Justice and Health Equity
      • Excellence in Community Surgery
      • Distinguished Service
      • Early Career Researcher
      • Researcher in Training
      • Jeff Ponsky Master Educator
      • Excellence in Medical Leadership
      • Barbara Berci Memorial Award
      • Brandeis Scholarship
      • Advocacy Summit
      • RAFT Annual Meeting Abstract Contest and Awards
  • Meetings
    • NBT Innovation Weekend
    • SAGES Annual Meeting
      • 2024 Scientific Session Call For Abstracts
      • 2024 Emerging Technology Call For Abstracts
    • CME Claim Form
    • Industry
      • Advertising Opportunities
      • Exhibit Opportunities
      • Sponsorship Opportunities
    • Future Meetings
    • Past Meetings
      • SAGES 2022
      • SAGES 2021
    • Related Meetings Calendar
  • Join SAGES!
    • Membership Benefits
    • Membership Applications
      • Active Membership
      • Affiliate Membership
      • Associate Active Membership
      • Candidate Membership
      • International Membership
      • Medical Student Membership
    • Member News
      • Member Spotlight
      • Give the Gift of SAGES Membership
  • Patients
    • Healthy Sooner – Patient Information for Minimally Invasive Surgery
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Choosing Wisely – An Initiative of the ABIM Foundation
    • All in the Recovery: Colorectal Cancer Alliance
    • Find a SAGES Member
  • Publications
    • SAGES Stories Podcast
    • SAGES Clinical / Practice / Training Guidelines, Statements, and Standards of Practice
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • TAVAC – Technology and Value Assessments
    • Surgical Endoscopy and Other Journal Information
    • SAGES Manuals
    • SCOPE – The SAGES Newsletter
    • COVID-19 Annoucements
    • Troubleshooting Guides
  • Education
    • OpiVoid.org
    • SAGES.TV Video Library
    • Safe Cholecystectomy Program
      • Safe Cholecystectomy Didactic Modules
    • Masters Program
      • SAGES Facebook Program Collaboratives
      • Acute Care Surgery
      • Bariatric
      • Biliary
      • Colorectal
      • Flexible Endoscopy (upper or lower)
      • Foregut
      • Hernia
      • Robotics
    • Educational Opportunities
    • HPB/Solid Organ Program
    • Courses for Residents
      • Advanced Courses
      • Basic Courses
    • Video Based Assessments (VBA)
    • Robotics Fellows Course
    • MIS Fellows Course
    • Facebook Livestreams
    • Free Webinars For Residents
    • SMART Enhanced Recovery Program
    • SAGES OR SAFETY Video
    • SAGES at Cine-Med
      • SAGES Top 21 MIS Procedures
      • SAGES Pearls
      • SAGES Flexible Endoscopy 101
      • SAGES Tips & Tricks of the Top 21
  • Opportunities
    • NEW-Area of Concentrated Training Seal (ACT)-Advanced Flexible Endoscopy
    • SAGES Fellowship Certification for Advanced GI MIS and Comprehensive Flexible Endoscopy
    • Multi-Society Foregut Fellowship Certification
    • SAGES Research Opportunities
    • Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery
    • Fundamentals of Endoscopic Surgery
    • Fundamental Use of Surgical Energy
    • Job Board
    • SAGES Go Global: Global Affairs and Humanitarian Efforts
  • Search
    • Search All SAGES Content
    • Search SAGES Guidelines
    • Search the Video Library
    • Search the Image Library
    • Search the Abstracts Archive
  • Store
    • “Unofficial” Logo Products
  • Log In

Comparison of Ventral Hernia in Patients Undergoing Single Incision Versus Standard Multiport Laparoscopic Colectomy

Awais Ashfaq, MD, Kian Ahmadieh, Adil A Shah, MD, Alyssa B Chapital, MD, PhD, FACS, Daniel J Johnson, MD, FACS, Kristi L Harold, MD, FACS. Mayo Clinic

Introduction: Single incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) is thought to reduce both incisional trauma and postoperative pain. Use of SILS has gained widespread interest in colectomies as there has been no reported difference in morbidity compared to standard multiport laparoscopic (ML) colectomies. However, hernia rates comparing both approaches have never been reported. The aim of this study was to compare the rates of ventral hernia (VH) in patients undergoing SILS versus ML.

Methods: All patients undergoing SILS and ML colectomies were entered into an IRB approved database from January 2010 to June 2014. The primary endpoint was the incidence of ventral hernia and secondary end points included type of hernia repair, operative time, length of hospital stay, recurrence and complications.

Results: A total of 406 patients (SILS=51, 13%; ML=355, 87%), male (n=32, 53%), underwent colectomies during the study period. Mean age at VH diagnosis was 66±13 years (SILS=67±14; ML=66±13). There was no statistically significant difference in the observed comorbidities in the two groups (SILS vs ML). Most common surgical procedure was laparoscopic right hemicolectomy (n=24, 40%) followed by sigmoidectomy (n=19, 31.7%). Most common indication for operation was polyp/cancer (n=33, 55%) followed by diverticulitis (n=18, 30%). Mean time to diagnose VH after laparoscopic colectomy (SILS=9±4, ML=14±11 months; p=0.014) and incidence of VH (SILS=11, 21.6%; ML=49, 13.8%; p<0.001) were statistically significant. A total of 26 (43%) patients (SILS=5, 19%; ML=21, 81%) underwent VH repair. Out of these, 19 (73%) were done laparoscopically (SILS=3, 16%; ML=16, 84%). Mean size of hernia defect was 57 (1-625) cm2 (SILS=64±90, ML=27±18; p=0.064). There was no statistically significant difference between lengths of hospital stay, recurrences, surgical site infection, fascial dehiscence, bowel injury and other morbidities. Mean length of follow up was 21±16 months (SILS=30±9; ML=20±16 months).

Conclusion: Incidence of VH is higher in SILS compared to ML colectomies. Laparoscopic repair of VH after colectomies (SILS/ML) is feasible with minimal complications in both groups. Further prospective multi-institutional studies are needed to better study the risk of VH in SILS patients.

77

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Pinterest
  • WhatsApp
  • Reddit

Related

« Return to SAGES 2016 abstract archive

Hours & Info

11300 West Olympic Blvd, Suite 600
Los Angeles, CA 90064
1-310-437-0544
sagesweb@sages.org
Monday - Friday
8am to 5pm Pacific Time

Find Us Around the Web!

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Important Links

SAGES 2023 Meeting Information

Healthy Sooner: Patient Information

SAGES Guidelines, Statements, & Standards of Practice

SAGES Manuals

 

  • taTME Study Info
  • Foundation
  • SAGES.TV
  • MyCME
  • Educational Activities

Copyright © 2023 Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons