• Skip to main content
  • Skip to header right navigation
  • Skip to site footer

Log in
www.sages.org

SAGES

Reimagining surgical care for a healthier world

  • Home
    • SAGES Home
    • SAGES Foundation Home
  • About
    • Awards
    • Who Is SAGES?
    • Leadership
    • Our Mission
    • Advocacy
    • Committees
      • SAGES Board of Governors
      • Officers and Representatives of the Society
      • Committee Chairs and Co-Chairs
      • Committee Rosters
      • SAGES Past Presidents
    • Why Should You Support SAGES?
    • SAGES Swag
  • Meetings
    • SAGES NBT Innovation Weekend
    • SAGES Annual Meeting
      • 2026 Annual Meeting
      • 2027 Scientific Session Call for Abstracts
      • 2027 Emerging Technology Call for Abstracts
    • CME Claim Form
    • SAGES Past, Present, Future, and Related Meeting Information
    • SAGES Related Meetings & Events Calendar
  • Join SAGES!
    • Membership Application
    • Membership Benefits
    • Membership Types
      • Requirements and Applications for Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Affiliate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Associate Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Candidate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for International Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements for Medical Student Membership
    • Member Spotlight
    • Give the Gift of SAGES Membership
  • Patients
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Healthy Sooner – Patient Information for Minimally Invasive Surgery
    • Choosing Wisely – An Initiative of the ABIM Foundation
    • All in the Recovery: Colorectal Cancer Alliance
    • Find A SAGES Surgeon
  • Publications
    • Clinical / Practice / Training Guidelines, Statements, and Standards of Practice
    • Sustainability in Surgical Practice
    • SAGES Stories Podcast
    • SAGES Lead Up Podcast
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Patient Information From SAGES
    • TAVAC – Technology and Value Assessments
    • Surgical Endoscopy and Other Journal Information
    • Innovative Surgical Trends
    • SAGES Manuals
    • MesSAGES – The SAGES Newsletter
    • COVID-19 Archive
    • Troubleshooting Guides
  • Education
    • Wellness Resources – You Are Not Alone
    • Avoid Opiates After Surgery
    • SAGES Subscription Catalog
    • SAGES TV: Home of SAGES Surgical Videos
    • The SAGES Safe Cholecystectomy Program
    • Masters Program
    • Resident and Fellow Opportunities
      • MIS Fellows Course
      • SAGES Robotics Residents and Fellows Courses
      • SAGES Free Resident Webinar Series
      • Advanced Laparoscopy and Fluorescence-Guided Surgery Course for Fellows
      • Fellows’ Career Development Course
    • SAGES S.M.A.R.T. Enhanced Recovery Program
    • SAGES @ Cine-Med Products
      • SAGES Top 21 Minimally Invasive Procedures Every Practicing Surgeon Should Know
      • SAGES Pearls Step-by-Step
      • SAGES Flexible Endoscopy 101
    • SAGES OR SAFETY Video Activity
    • Foregut Video Atlas
  • Opportunities
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Fellowship Recognition Opportunities
    • SAGES Advanced Flexible Endoscopy Area of Concentrated Training (ACT) SEAL
    • Multi-Society Foregut Fellowship Certification
    • Research Opportunities
    • FLS
    • FES
    • FUSE
    • Jobs Board
    • SAGES Go Global: Global Affairs
  • Learning Hub
You are here: Home / Abstracts / Comparison of Results and Complications of Stapled Hemorrhoidopexy Performed With the Ethicon and Covidien Staplers

Comparison of Results and Complications of Stapled Hemorrhoidopexy Performed With the Ethicon and Covidien Staplers

Rebekah Kim, MD, Andrea Ferrara, Mark Soliman, Robert Stevens, Samuel Dejesus, Paul Williamson, Joseph Gallagher, Jay Macgregor, Kiyanda Baldwin. Colon and Rectal Clinic of Orlando, Orlando Health

 

Purpose : Two staplers (Ethicon Proximate Hemorrhoidal Circular Stapler and Covidien EEA Hemorrhoid & Prolapse Stapler Set) are currently available for stapled hemorrhoidectomy in the United States. Our aim was to compare the results of both devices by experienced Colon and Rectal Surgeons.

Methods : Retrospective analysis of the initial forty consecutive patients that underwent Ethicon hemorroidopexy in 2003 were compared to our initial experience using the Covidien device in 2010. In addition, forty patients who underwent hemorrhoidopexy with the Ethicon device in 2010 were studied due to the learning curve when the procedure was first introduced. All operations were performed by 5 board certified Colon and Rectal Surgeons. Complications were characterized into early (<2 weeks), and late (>2 weeks) after the initial surgery. Data regarding readmission, hemorrhoid grade, patient age and sex, as well as ancillary procedures at the time of stapled hemorrhoidopexy were compared.

Results : One hundred and twenty charts were reviewed (74 male [63%], 46 female [37%], mean age 48.7 [21-82]). Eleven (9%) had Grade II, 108 patients (90%) had Grade III, and 1 (0.8%) had Grade IV internal hemorrhoids. Early complications (<2 weeks) and ancillary procedures are listed (Table). Two weeks after surgery, 1 patient (2.5%) in each of the groups complained of anal pain. In the early Ethicon group 1 patient (2.5%) complained of fecal incontinence, and 4 (10%) presented with fissure-in-ano. In the late Ethicon group, 1 patient (2.5%) presented with a fissure-in-ano, and 2 (5%) presented with a thrombosed external hemorrhoid requiring excision. The early Covidien group had 1 patient (2.5%) with complaints of constipation, and 1 (2.5%) with a thrombosed external hemorrhoid requiring excision. The late Ethicon and Early Covidien groups both had ancillary procedures such as excision of anal skin tags in addition to the stapled hemorrhoidopexy at time of surgery.

  Early Ethicon (n=40) Late Ethicon (n=40) Early Covidien (n=40)
EARLY (<2 weeks)      
Stapler misfire 0 0 0
Bleeding 1 (2.5%) 1 (2.5%) 0
Urinary retention 3 (7.5%) 0 2 (5%)
Excessive pain 5 (12.5%) 1 (2.5%) 3 (7.5%)
Thrombosed ext hemorrhoids 2 (5%) 0 2 (5%)
Abscess/fistula 0 1 (2.5%) 0
Fissure-in-ano 1 (2.5%) 0 0
TOTAL 12 (30%) 3 (15%) 5 (20%)
       
ANCILLARY PROCEDURES (AP) 0 12 (30%) 15 (37.5%)
Excision of skin tag – 8 (20%) 7 (17.5%)
External hemorrhoidectomy – 3 (7.5%) 5 (12.5%)
Fissure cauterization – 0 1 (2.5%)
Excision of papilla – 1 (2.5%) 2 (5%)
NUMBER OF PATIENTS WITH ANCILLARY PROCEDURES N/A 0 5 (12.5%)
       

Conclusions : In our initial experience with both the Ethicon and Covidien devices, the rates of early and late complications are similar. The rates of complications in the early and late Ethicon groups show a slightly decreased rate of urinary retention and pain requiring readmission among patients, however neither were statistically significant. The increasing excision of skin tags and external hemorrhoids during stapled hemorrhoidopexy may decrease the rate of recurrence.
 


Session Number: Poster – Poster Presentations
Program Number: P128
View Poster

Related



Hours & Info

15821 Ventura Blvd Ste 400
Encino, CA 91436

1-310-437-0544

[email protected]

Monday – Friday
8am to 5pm Pacific Time

Find Us Around the Web!

  • Bluesky
  • X
  • Instagram
  • Facebook
  • YouTube

Copyright © 2026 · SAGES · All Rights Reserved

Important Links

Healthy Sooner: Patient Information

SAGES Guidelines, Statements, & Standards of Practice

SAGES Manuals

Refine Search