• Skip to main content
  • Skip to header right navigation
  • Skip to site footer

Log in
  • Search
    • Search All SAGES Content
    • Search SAGES Guidelines
    • Search the Video Library
    • Search the Image Library
    • Search the Abstracts Archive
www.sages.org

SAGES

Reimagining surgical care for a healthier world

  • Home
    • Search
    • SAGES Home
    • SAGES Foundation Home
  • About
    • Awards
    • Who Is SAGES?
    • Leadership
    • Our Mission
    • Advocacy
    • Committees
      • SAGES Board of Governors
      • Officers and Representatives of the Society
      • Committee Chairs and Co-Chairs
      • Committee Rosters
      • SAGES Past Presidents
  • Meetings
    • SAGES NBT Innovation Weekend
    • SAGES Annual Meeting
      • 2026 Scientific Session Call for Abstracts
      • 2026 Emerging Technology Call for Abstracts
    • CME Claim Form
    • SAGES Past, Present, Future, and Related Meeting Information
    • SAGES Related Meetings & Events Calendar
  • Join SAGES!
    • Membership Application
    • Membership Benefits
    • Membership Types
      • Requirements and Applications for Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Affiliate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Associate Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Candidate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for International Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements for Medical Student Membership
    • Member Spotlight
    • Give the Gift of SAGES Membership
  • Patients
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Healthy Sooner – Patient Information for Minimally Invasive Surgery
    • Choosing Wisely – An Initiative of the ABIM Foundation
    • All in the Recovery: Colorectal Cancer Alliance
    • Find A SAGES Surgeon
  • Publications
    • Clinical / Practice / Training Guidelines, Statements, and Standards of Practice
    • Sustainability in Surgical Practice
    • SAGES Stories Podcast
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Patient Information From SAGES
    • TAVAC – Technology and Value Assessments
    • Surgical Endoscopy and Other Journal Information
    • SAGES Manuals
    • MesSAGES – The SAGES Newsletter
    • COVID-19 Archive
    • Troubleshooting Guides
  • Education
    • Wellness Resources – You Are Not Alone
    • Avoid Opiates After Surgery
    • SAGES Subscription Catalog
    • SAGES TV: Home of SAGES Surgical Videos
    • The SAGES Safe Cholecystectomy Program
    • Masters Program
    • Resident and Fellow Opportunities
      • MIS Fellows Course
      • SAGES Robotics Residents and Fellows Courses
      • SAGES Free Resident Webinar Series
      • Fluorescence-Guided Surgery Course for Fellows
      • Fellows’ Career Development Course
    • SAGES S.M.A.R.T. Enhanced Recovery Program
    • SAGES @ Cine-Med Products
      • SAGES Top 21 Minimally Invasive Procedures Every Practicing Surgeon Should Know
      • SAGES Pearls Step-by-Step
      • SAGES Flexible Endoscopy 101
    • SAGES OR SAFETY Video Activity
  • Opportunities
    • Fellowship Recognition Opportunities
    • SAGES Advanced Flexible Endoscopy Area of Concentrated Training (ACT) SEAL
    • Multi-Society Foregut Fellowship Certification
    • Research Opportunities
    • FLS
    • FES
    • FUSE
    • Jobs Board
    • SAGES Go Global: Global Affairs and Humanitarian Efforts
  • OWLS/FLS
You are here: Home / Abstracts / Cognitive Bias and Decision Making in Bariatric Surgery; Surgeons Preference for Sleeve or Band Depresses Performance on Questions Related to Esophageal

Cognitive Bias and Decision Making in Bariatric Surgery; Surgeons Preference for Sleeve or Band Depresses Performance on Questions Related to Esophageal

R Rutledge, MD

Center for Laparoscopic Obesity Surgery

We performed a survey of 112 international experts in bariatric surgery from 23 countries.
Surgeons were classified into; surgeons who preferred Band or the Sleeve (Pro-BS Surgeons) and surgeons who preferred the Mini-Gastric Bypass (Pro-MB).
Results: In summary Pro-MB Surgeons performed significantly better on all questions than Pro-BS Surgeons! Some examples are provided below:
“There are many large scale studies that show no increased risk of gastric cancer after Billroth II” i.e.: 30 yr f/u, over 500 pts., “Risk of gastric cancer is * Not * increased after partial gastrectomy.” Bassily R, .J Gastro-Hepatology. 2000. 44% of Pro-BS Surgeons did NOT agree with this statement and 12% of Pro-MB surgeons disagreed.

“In a study from the Netherlands of 58,279 patients 162 stomach cancers were detected. A higher risk for stomach cancer was found for men with the lowest level of education (RR lowest/highest level = 2.0, p = 0.02) i.e. Lower education = higher risk of stomach cancer. Do you think less education “CAUSES” stomach cancer? Surprisingly 15% of Pro-BS surgeons answered: Less Education “Causes” Gastric Cancer!

“Unoperated Gastric Ulcer patients have double the risk for Gastric Cancer: Am J Gastroenterology 2007 Jun;102(6):1185-91. Pub 2007 Apr 13. Long-term risk of gastric cancer by subsite in operated and unoperated patients hospitalized for peptic ulcer. Bahmanyar S, et al. 29% Disagreed with this question, even though the relevant article was quoted and referenced for them.

“The death rate stomach cancer in the United States has dropped from 28 to 5 per 100,000 people.” 25.4% of Pro_BS disagreed with this true statement.

“Numerous Studies Now Show that the Band and the Sleeve can increase acid reflux and be associated with Barretts & Esophageal Caner.” While 64.5% of Pro-BS surgeons agreed with this statement 35.5%, over 1/3 disagreed. This in spite of 90% agreement with “GERD Increases Risk of Cancer of Esophagus” and “Treating or Avoiding GERD may protect & prevent Barrett’s & Esophageal cancer.”

Pro-BS surgeons scored uniformly lower than Pro-MB surgeons

Overall it seems probable that Pro-BS surgeons are not less intelligent than Pro-MB surgeons. If that is so how can we explain the significantly higher error rate among the Pro-BS surgeons on questions of fact.

Many of our questions were referencing studies that tended to show the MGB in a positive light. Cognitive biases such as Reactance (the urge to do the opposite of what someone wants you to do out of a need to resist a perceived attempt to constrain freedom) may have led Pro-BS surgeons to answering questions incorrectly.

Conclusions: Studies clearly show a relation between surgeon’s knowledge performance and patient outcomes. This study demonstrated that surgeons who prefer the Sleeve and Band commonly make erroneous judgments about bile reflux, acid reflux, esophageal & gastric cancer and other important issues. If we hypothesize that this documented error rate is because of various cognitive biases then we may also have a means of improving these surgeon’s knowledge and performance.


Session: Poster Presentation

Program Number: P601

312

Share this:

  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window) Pocket
  • Click to share on Mastodon (Opens in new window) Mastodon
  • Click to share on Threads (Opens in new window) Threads
  • Click to share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky

Related


sages_adbutler_leaderboard

Hours & Info

11300 West Olympic Blvd, Suite 600
Los Angeles, CA 90064

1-310-437-0544

[email protected]

Monday – Friday
8am to 5pm Pacific Time

Find Us Around the Web!

  • Bluesky
  • X
  • Instagram
  • Facebook
  • YouTube

Copyright © 2025 · SAGES · All Rights Reserved

Important Links

Healthy Sooner: Patient Information

SAGES Guidelines, Statements, & Standards of Practice

SAGES Manuals