• Skip to main content
  • Skip to header right navigation
  • Skip to site footer

Log in
www.sages.org

SAGES

Reimagining surgical care for a healthier world

  • Home
    • SAGES Home
    • SAGES Foundation Home
  • About
    • Awards
    • Who Is SAGES?
    • Leadership
    • Our Mission
    • Advocacy
    • Committees
      • SAGES Board of Governors
      • Officers and Representatives of the Society
      • Committee Chairs and Co-Chairs
      • Committee Rosters
      • SAGES Past Presidents
    • Why Should You Support SAGES?
    • SAGES Swag
  • Meetings
    • SAGES NBT Innovation Weekend
    • SAGES Annual Meeting
      • 2026 Annual Meeting
      • 2027 Scientific Session Call for Abstracts
      • 2027 Emerging Technology Call for Abstracts
    • CME Claim Form
    • SAGES Past, Present, Future, and Related Meeting Information
    • SAGES Related Meetings & Events Calendar
  • Join SAGES!
    • Membership Application
    • Membership Benefits
    • Membership Types
      • Requirements and Applications for Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Affiliate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Associate Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Candidate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for International Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements for Medical Student Membership
    • Member Spotlight
    • Give the Gift of SAGES Membership
  • Patients
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Healthy Sooner – Patient Information for Minimally Invasive Surgery
    • Choosing Wisely – An Initiative of the ABIM Foundation
    • All in the Recovery: Colorectal Cancer Alliance
    • Find A SAGES Surgeon
  • Publications
    • Clinical / Practice / Training Guidelines, Statements, and Standards of Practice
    • Sustainability in Surgical Practice
    • SAGES Stories Podcast
    • SAGES Lead Up Podcast
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Patient Information From SAGES
    • TAVAC – Technology and Value Assessments
    • Surgical Endoscopy and Other Journal Information
    • Innovative Surgical Trends
    • SAGES Manuals
    • MesSAGES – The SAGES Newsletter
    • COVID-19 Archive
    • Troubleshooting Guides
  • Education
    • Wellness Resources – You Are Not Alone
    • Avoid Opiates After Surgery
    • SAGES Subscription Catalog
    • SAGES TV: Home of SAGES Surgical Videos
    • The SAGES Safe Cholecystectomy Program
    • Masters Program
    • Resident and Fellow Opportunities
      • MIS Fellows Course
      • SAGES Robotics Residents and Fellows Courses
      • SAGES Free Resident Webinar Series
      • Advanced Laparoscopy and Fluorescence-Guided Surgery Course for Fellows
      • Fellows’ Career Development Course
    • SAGES S.M.A.R.T. Enhanced Recovery Program
    • SAGES @ Cine-Med Products
      • SAGES Top 21 Minimally Invasive Procedures Every Practicing Surgeon Should Know
      • SAGES Pearls Step-by-Step
      • SAGES Flexible Endoscopy 101
    • SAGES OR SAFETY Video Activity
    • Foregut Video Atlas
  • Opportunities
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Fellowship Recognition Opportunities
    • SAGES Advanced Flexible Endoscopy Area of Concentrated Training (ACT) SEAL
    • Multi-Society Foregut Fellowship Certification
    • Research Opportunities
    • FLS
    • FES
    • FUSE
    • Jobs Board
    • SAGES Go Global: Global Affairs
  • Learning Hub
You are here: Home / Abstracts / Clinical Outcomes of Atypical Symptoms Following Laparoscopic Antireflux Surgery

Clinical Outcomes of Atypical Symptoms Following Laparoscopic Antireflux Surgery

Introduction: Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) can manifest with both typical (heartburn, regurgitation) and atypical symptoms (cough, hoarseness, wheeze). While it is well established that antireflux surgery is effective in relieving typical symptoms, it is currently unclear whether atypical symptoms foreshadow a less satisfactory outcome following laparoscopic antireflux surgery (LARS). The purpose of this study is to critically analyze the clinical outcomes of atypical symptoms in patients undergoing LARS.

Methods: Patients scheduled for LARS were prospectively enrolled in this IRB-approved study over a 5 year period. All subjects included in this study underwent preoperative high resolution manometry (HRM) and hadevidence ofGERDon an ambulatory pH study. For the purpose of this study, cough, wheeze and hoarseness were considered atypical symptoms. During preoperative and postoperative examinations, patients completed detailed foregut symptom questionnaires, using both 5-point Likert and 10-point visual analog scales (VAS) to document typical as well as atypical symptoms. Atypical symptom burden was calculated as a sum of VAS for the three atypical symptoms, termed the atypical score (ATS). HRM patterns were grouped into normal, spastic and hypomotile. Data are expressed as mean ± standard errors of mean. Statistical significance (p<0.05) was determined using paired t-test, and analysis of variance with post-hoc LSD.

Results: 113 patients (49±1.26 yr, range 20-84 yr, M:F 47:66) with a mean follow up of 28±2.31 months (range, 1-92) fulfilled inclusion criteria, and had a mean modified DeMeester score of 45.5± 2.78. Heartburn was notedby 84.1% of patients, while atypical symptoms of some degree were reported by 92.0% of patients. Heartburn improved from a preoperative score of 7.1±0.54 to 0.9±0.24 after LARS, and ATS improved from 9.0±0.71 to 2.2±0.42. Further comparison of preoperative to postoperative symptomatology revealed significant improvement in cough, wheeze, and hoarseness.

Preoperative Postoperative P
Cough 3.779 ± 0.30 0.947 ± 0.20 <0.0001
Wheeze 2.033 ± 0.28 0.564 ± 0.15 <0.0001
Hoarseness 3.165 ± 0.30 0.823 ± 0.17 <0.0001

Improvement in atypical symptoms was least in the presence of hypomotility features on HRM (21.7% improvement), compared to normal motility (72.0%) and spastic features (83.9%). Preoperative atypical score (p<0.0001) and esophageal hypomotility (p=0.04) demonstrated a linear relationship with postoperative atypical score.

Conclusion: In patients undergoing LARS, atypical GERD symptoms improve as significantly as typical symptoms. Symptom improvement is significantly lower in the presence of esophageal hypomotility, therefore patients with severe atypical symptoms or a hypomotile esophagus may not achieve the same clinical satisfaction from LARS.


Session: Poster of Distinction

Program Number: P005

View Poster

Related



Hours & Info

15821 Ventura Blvd Ste 400
Encino, CA 91436

1-310-437-0544

[email protected]

Monday – Friday
8am to 5pm Pacific Time

Find Us Around the Web!

  • Bluesky
  • X
  • Instagram
  • Facebook
  • YouTube

Copyright © 2026 · SAGES · All Rights Reserved

Important Links

Healthy Sooner: Patient Information

SAGES Guidelines, Statements, & Standards of Practice

SAGES Manuals

Refine Search