• Skip to main content
  • Skip to header right navigation
  • Skip to site footer

Log in
www.sages.org

SAGES

Reimagining surgical care for a healthier world

  • Home
    • SAGES Home
    • SAGES Foundation Home
  • About
    • Awards
    • Who Is SAGES?
    • Leadership
    • Our Mission
    • Advocacy
    • Committees
      • SAGES Board of Governors
      • Officers and Representatives of the Society
      • Committee Chairs and Co-Chairs
      • Committee Rosters
      • SAGES Past Presidents
    • Why Should You Support SAGES?
    • SAGES Swag
  • Meetings
    • SAGES NBT Innovation Weekend
    • SAGES Annual Meeting
      • 2026 Annual Meeting
      • 2027 Scientific Session Call for Abstracts
      • 2027 Emerging Technology Call for Abstracts
    • CME Claim Form
    • SAGES Past, Present, Future, and Related Meeting Information
    • SAGES Related Meetings & Events Calendar
  • Join SAGES!
    • Membership Application
    • Membership Benefits
    • Membership Types
      • Requirements and Applications for Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Affiliate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Associate Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Candidate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for International Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements for Medical Student Membership
    • Member Spotlight
    • Give the Gift of SAGES Membership
  • Patients
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Healthy Sooner – Patient Information for Minimally Invasive Surgery
    • Choosing Wisely – An Initiative of the ABIM Foundation
    • All in the Recovery: Colorectal Cancer Alliance
    • Find A SAGES Surgeon
  • Publications
    • Clinical / Practice / Training Guidelines, Statements, and Standards of Practice
    • Sustainability in Surgical Practice
    • SAGES Stories Podcast
    • SAGES Lead Up Podcast
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Patient Information From SAGES
    • TAVAC – Technology and Value Assessments
    • Surgical Endoscopy and Other Journal Information
    • Innovative Surgical Trends
    • SAGES Manuals
    • MesSAGES – The SAGES Newsletter
    • COVID-19 Archive
    • Troubleshooting Guides
  • Education
    • Wellness Resources – You Are Not Alone
    • Avoid Opiates After Surgery
    • SAGES Subscription Catalog
    • SAGES TV: Home of SAGES Surgical Videos
    • The SAGES Safe Cholecystectomy Program
    • Masters Program
    • Resident and Fellow Opportunities
      • MIS Fellows Course
      • SAGES Robotics Residents and Fellows Courses
      • SAGES Free Resident Webinar Series
      • Advanced Laparoscopy and Fluorescence-Guided Surgery Course for Fellows
      • Fellows’ Career Development Course
    • SAGES S.M.A.R.T. Enhanced Recovery Program
    • SAGES @ Cine-Med Products
      • SAGES Top 21 Minimally Invasive Procedures Every Practicing Surgeon Should Know
      • SAGES Pearls Step-by-Step
      • SAGES Flexible Endoscopy 101
    • SAGES OR SAFETY Video Activity
    • Foregut Video Atlas
  • Opportunities
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Fellowship Recognition Opportunities
    • SAGES Advanced Flexible Endoscopy Area of Concentrated Training (ACT) SEAL
    • Multi-Society Foregut Fellowship Certification
    • Research Opportunities
    • FLS
    • FES
    • FUSE
    • Jobs Board
    • SAGES Go Global: Global Affairs
  • Learning Hub
You are here: Home / Abstracts / Assessment of Gastric Conduit Ischemia Following Esophagectomy: The Role of Ct-scan Vs. Early Endoscopy

Assessment of Gastric Conduit Ischemia Following Esophagectomy: The Role of Ct-scan Vs. Early Endoscopy

Background: Ischemia of the gastric conduit is a rare but devastating complication of esophagectomy. Fear of iatrogenic injury to the anastomosis by early endoscopy has resulted in use of CT scan for diagnosis of this complication which may lead to delay in diagnosis. The aim of this study was to assess the role of CT scan vs. early upper endoscopy to assess ischemia of the gastric conduit following esophagectomy.
Methods: Between 2002 and 2007, 704 patients underwent an esophagectomy and gastric pull up at the University of Southern California. Records were reviewed to identify patients who underwent endoscopy for suspicion of ischemic conduit at a median of 7 days (IQR 5-9) and a CT-scan within 24 hours of the endoscopy. The accuracy of CT-scan and endoscopy were compared.
Results: Seventy six patients had endoscopy and a CT-scan performed for clinical suspicion of graft ischemia. Endoscopy showed evidence of ischemia in 52 patients. There were no complications associated with early endoscopy. CT-scan showed evidence of ischemia in 10/52 patients (19%). Seven of these patients had air in the soft tissue of the neck/mediastinum, 3 had a perianastomotic or mediastinal fluid collection and all 10 had graft ischemia on endoscopy. The remaining 42 patients (81%) with graft ischemia on endoscopy had normal findings on CT-scan. Seven of these patients had graft necrosis and were all missed on CT-scan. The ischemic conduit was removed in these 7 patients. The remaining patients responded to conservative therapy.
Conclusion: A normal CT scan does not rule out the possibility of an ischemic conduit following esophagectomy. Early endoscopy is safe and remains the diagnostic test of choice.


Session: Poster

Program Number: P352

View Poster

Related



Hours & Info

15821 Ventura Blvd Ste 400
Encino, CA 91436

1-310-437-0544

[email protected]

Monday – Friday
8am to 5pm Pacific Time

Find Us Around the Web!

  • Bluesky
  • X
  • Instagram
  • Facebook
  • YouTube

Copyright © 2026 · SAGES · All Rights Reserved

Important Links

Healthy Sooner: Patient Information

SAGES Guidelines, Statements, & Standards of Practice

SAGES Manuals

Refine Search