• Skip to main content
  • Skip to header right navigation
  • Skip to site footer

Log in
www.sages.org

SAGES

Reimagining surgical care for a healthier world

  • Home
    • SAGES Home
    • SAGES Foundation Home
  • About
    • Awards
    • Who Is SAGES?
    • Leadership
    • Our Mission
    • Advocacy
    • Committees
      • SAGES Board of Governors
      • Officers and Representatives of the Society
      • Committee Chairs and Co-Chairs
      • Committee Rosters
      • SAGES Past Presidents
    • Why Should You Support SAGES?
    • SAGES Swag
  • Meetings
    • SAGES NBT Innovation Weekend
    • SAGES Annual Meeting
      • 2026 Annual Meeting
      • 2027 Scientific Session Call for Abstracts
      • 2027 Emerging Technology Call for Abstracts
    • CME Claim Form
    • SAGES Past, Present, Future, and Related Meeting Information
    • SAGES Related Meetings & Events Calendar
  • Join SAGES!
    • Membership Application
    • Membership Benefits
    • Membership Types
      • Requirements and Applications for Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Affiliate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Associate Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Candidate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for International Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements for Medical Student Membership
    • Member Spotlight
    • Give the Gift of SAGES Membership
  • Patients
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Healthy Sooner – Patient Information for Minimally Invasive Surgery
    • Choosing Wisely – An Initiative of the ABIM Foundation
    • All in the Recovery: Colorectal Cancer Alliance
    • Find A SAGES Surgeon
  • Publications
    • Clinical / Practice / Training Guidelines, Statements, and Standards of Practice
    • Sustainability in Surgical Practice
    • SAGES Stories Podcast
    • SAGES Lead Up Podcast
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Patient Information From SAGES
    • TAVAC – Technology and Value Assessments
    • Surgical Endoscopy and Other Journal Information
    • Innovative Surgical Trends
    • SAGES Manuals
    • MesSAGES – The SAGES Newsletter
    • COVID-19 Archive
    • Troubleshooting Guides
  • Education
    • Wellness Resources – You Are Not Alone
    • Avoid Opiates After Surgery
    • SAGES Subscription Catalog
    • SAGES TV: Home of SAGES Surgical Videos
    • The SAGES Safe Cholecystectomy Program
    • Masters Program
    • Resident and Fellow Opportunities
      • MIS Fellows Course
      • SAGES Robotics Residents and Fellows Courses
      • SAGES Free Resident Webinar Series
      • Advanced Laparoscopy and Fluorescence-Guided Surgery Course for Fellows
      • Fellows’ Career Development Course
    • SAGES S.M.A.R.T. Enhanced Recovery Program
    • SAGES @ Cine-Med Products
      • SAGES Top 21 Minimally Invasive Procedures Every Practicing Surgeon Should Know
      • SAGES Pearls Step-by-Step
      • SAGES Flexible Endoscopy 101
    • SAGES OR SAFETY Video Activity
    • Foregut Video Atlas
  • Opportunities
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Fellowship Recognition Opportunities
    • SAGES Advanced Flexible Endoscopy Area of Concentrated Training (ACT) SEAL
    • Multi-Society Foregut Fellowship Certification
    • Research Opportunities
    • FLS
    • FES
    • FUSE
    • Jobs Board
    • SAGES Go Global: Global Affairs
  • Learning Hub
You are here: Home / Abstracts / Are Colonoscopies By Colorectal Surgeons Adequate?

Are Colonoscopies By Colorectal Surgeons Adequate?

Background- Colorectal surgeons (CRSs) generally undergo more training in colonoscopy than do general surgeons. In practice, most CRSs do a lower volume than gastroenterologists. Competency has been cited as >90% cecal intubation. Expert endoscopist may reach 95%. Are colonoscopies by CRSs as good as high volumes gastroenterologists in terms of cecal intubation and polyp detection rates?
Aim- To review the 14 year colonoscopy experience of an individual academic colon and rectal surgeon and assess the rate of cecal intubation, cause of any failures, and polyp detection rate.
Methods- A prospectively maintained clinical CRS database was queried, to identify colonoscopy performed by a single CRS between 1995 and 2009. 1392 colonoscopies were reviewed. There were 783 male and 609 female patients. Cecal intubation rate was 94.5% (1316 completed). Polyp detection rate was 26.7% (371 polyps found). Reasons for incomplete colonoscopies include incomplete prep (15 pts), patient anatomy (35 pts), patient intolerance (24 pts) and stricture (3 pts). Of the 783 male patients that underwent colonoscopies, 31 were incomplete (7 patient intolerance, 14 patient anatomy, 3 strictures, and 7 poor preps) while of the 609 women that underwent colonoscopies, 45 incomplete procedures (13 patient intolerance, 24 patient anatomy, 1 stricture, and 7 poor preps). Women had a significantly higher incidence of incomplete colonoscopies versus men (p=0.006). 8 cancers were found and 1 anal cancer was found.
Conclusion- Despite the relatively few number of colonoscopies done compared to expected numbers of a busy gastroenterologist, adenoma detection and intubation rates were excellent and well above national recommendations. A significantly higher rate of incomplete colonoscopies was noted in women which may be due to patient anatomy and intolerance.


Session: Poster

Program Number: P380

View Poster

Related



Hours & Info

15821 Ventura Blvd Ste 400
Encino, CA 91436

1-310-437-0544

[email protected]

Monday – Friday
8am to 5pm Pacific Time

Find Us Around the Web!

  • Bluesky
  • X
  • Instagram
  • Facebook
  • YouTube

Copyright © 2026 · SAGES · All Rights Reserved

Important Links

Healthy Sooner: Patient Information

SAGES Guidelines, Statements, & Standards of Practice

SAGES Manuals

Refine Search