• Skip to main content
  • Skip to header right navigation
  • Skip to site footer

Log in
www.sages.org

SAGES

Reimagining surgical care for a healthier world

  • Home
    • SAGES Home
    • SAGES Foundation Home
  • About
    • Awards
    • Who Is SAGES?
    • Leadership
    • Our Mission
    • Advocacy
    • Committees
      • SAGES Board of Governors
      • Officers and Representatives of the Society
      • Committee Chairs and Co-Chairs
      • Committee Rosters
      • SAGES Past Presidents
    • Why Should You Support SAGES?
    • SAGES Swag
  • Meetings
    • SAGES NBT Innovation Weekend
    • SAGES Annual Meeting
      • 2026 Annual Meeting
      • 2027 Scientific Session Call for Abstracts
      • 2027 Emerging Technology Call for Abstracts
    • CME Claim Form
    • SAGES Past, Present, Future, and Related Meeting Information
    • SAGES Related Meetings & Events Calendar
  • Join SAGES!
    • Membership Application
    • Membership Benefits
    • Membership Types
      • Requirements and Applications for Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Affiliate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Associate Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Candidate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for International Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements for Medical Student Membership
    • Member Spotlight
    • Give the Gift of SAGES Membership
  • Patients
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Healthy Sooner – Patient Information for Minimally Invasive Surgery
    • Choosing Wisely – An Initiative of the ABIM Foundation
    • All in the Recovery: Colorectal Cancer Alliance
    • Find A SAGES Surgeon
  • Publications
    • Clinical / Practice / Training Guidelines, Statements, and Standards of Practice
    • Sustainability in Surgical Practice
    • SAGES Stories Podcast
    • SAGES Lead Up Podcast
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Patient Information From SAGES
    • TAVAC – Technology and Value Assessments
    • Surgical Endoscopy and Other Journal Information
    • Innovative Surgical Trends
    • SAGES Manuals
    • MesSAGES – The SAGES Newsletter
    • COVID-19 Archive
    • Troubleshooting Guides
  • Education
    • Wellness Resources – You Are Not Alone
    • Avoid Opiates After Surgery
    • SAGES Subscription Catalog
    • SAGES TV: Home of SAGES Surgical Videos
    • The SAGES Safe Cholecystectomy Program
    • Masters Program
    • Resident and Fellow Opportunities
      • MIS Fellows Course
      • SAGES Robotics Residents and Fellows Courses
      • SAGES Free Resident Webinar Series
      • Advanced Laparoscopy and Fluorescence-Guided Surgery Course for Fellows
      • Fellows’ Career Development Course
    • SAGES S.M.A.R.T. Enhanced Recovery Program
    • SAGES @ Cine-Med Products
      • SAGES Top 21 Minimally Invasive Procedures Every Practicing Surgeon Should Know
      • SAGES Pearls Step-by-Step
      • SAGES Flexible Endoscopy 101
    • SAGES OR SAFETY Video Activity
    • Foregut Video Atlas
  • Opportunities
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Fellowship Recognition Opportunities
    • SAGES Advanced Flexible Endoscopy Area of Concentrated Training (ACT) SEAL
    • Multi-Society Foregut Fellowship Certification
    • Research Opportunities
    • FLS
    • FES
    • FUSE
    • Jobs Board
    • SAGES Go Global: Global Affairs
  • Learning Hub
You are here: Home / Abstracts / Analysis of Practice Patterns in 66103 Laparoscopic and Open Cholecystectomies Using the NSQIP Database

Analysis of Practice Patterns in 66103 Laparoscopic and Open Cholecystectomies Using the NSQIP Database

Jesse R Gutnick, MD, Allan E Siperstein, MD. Cleveland Clinic

 

INTRODUCTION
The National Surgical Quality Improvement (NSQIP) database provides an opportunity to observe practice patterns for cholecystectomy.

METHODS AND PROCEDURES
66103 laparoscopic (LC) and open cholecystectomies (OC) +/- intra-operative cholangiograms (+IOC) and common bile duct explorations (+CBDE) were extracted from the NSQIP database (2007-2009) and analyzed with JMP Version 9.

RESULTS
Overall, LC=88.4%, Converted to OC=1.9%, OC=9.7%.

Table 1. Percent and operative times (minutes) for chole+/-IOC/CBDE by procedure type

      Chole only     Chole+IOC only     Chole+IOC+CBDE
Procedure   % Time(SE)   % Time(SE)   % Time(SE)
LC   74.7 65.2(0.2)   24.7 73.1(0.3)   0.5 123.1(2.0)
Converted   78.3 126.1(1.8)   17.4 157.6(3.9)   4.4 195.8(7.7)
OC   75.9 118.9(1.0)   17.6 144.4(2.0)   6.5 169.0(3.3)

(Table 1: all p<0.0001 (SE=standard error))

Elevated bilirubin, aspartate transaminase, alkaline phosphatase are pre-operative risk factors for choledocholithiasis. In patients with 0, 1, 2, 3 risk factors elevated, IOC was performed in 24.2%, 30.0%, 37.8%, 41.5%, and IOC+CBDE was performed in 0.7%, 1.5%, 3.5%, 7.8% of patients (p<0.0001).

Cholecystectomy cases were performed by: attending alone in 37.6%, attending in the operating room with resident in 61.2%, attending in the operating suite in 0.9%, with attending not present or not entered in 0.3%.

Table 2. Percent, operative times (minutes), complication rates for LC, LC converted to OC, and OC by attending involvement
        Attending Alone       Attending with Resident     Attending in Suite  
Procedure   % Time(SE) Complication%   % Time(SE) Complication%   % Time(SE) Complication%
LC   91.8 54.2(0.2) 3.9   86.4 75.8(0.2) 3.8   81.4 82.0(2.0) 5.3
Converted   1.4 116.0(1.7) 16.2   2.3 114.3(1.4) 17.8   1.5 155.1(15.0) 22.2
OC   6.8 105.5(0.8) 19.2   11.3 134.0(0.6) 20.3   17.1 136.6(4.4) 21.1

(Table 2: all p<0.0001, except p>0.1 for complications rate by attending involvement)

Table 3. Percent, operative times (minutes), complication rates for chole+/-IOC+/-CBDE by attending involvement
        Attending Alone       Attending with Resident       Attending in Suite
Procedure   % Time(SE) Complication%   % Time(SE) Complication%   % Time(SE) Complication%
Chole-only   67.3 55.7(2.1) 5.0   7.5 79.8(0.3) 5.8   82.7 88.2(2.2) 7.9
Chole+IOC   31.7 63.1(0.4) 5.1   21.2 94.3(0.5) 5.9   16.3 112.8(5.1) 5.8
Chole+IOC+CBDE   1.0 117.9(2.1) 15.1   1.3 169.5(2.0) 18.3   1.0 136.2(20.1) 33.3

(Table 3: chole-only complication rate p=0.0009, other complication rates p>0.05, other p<0.0001)

Morbidity for all cholecystectomies, LC, Converted to OC, OC: 5.7%, 3.9%, 17.4%, 20.1% (p<0.0001). Return to operating room rate: 1.4% overall, LC 1.1%, Converted to OC 2.8%, OC 3.8% (p<0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS
This large dataset reveals several patterns. Operative times are longer, conversion rates are higher, and OC are more common with resident involvement, but complication rates are negligibly higher, and may reflect case mix. OC and Converted cases have comparable operating times and rates for morbidity, return to operating room, IOC, and CBDE, suggesting that conversion is most likely for elective indications other than choledocholithiasis, rather than intra-operative mishaps. IOC is performed less frequently than one would expect based on this dataset, i.e. pre-operative risk of choledocholithiasis and the minimal additional time for LC+IOC, or based on SAGES guidelines and teaching priorities. Similarly, LC+CBDE is rare in this dataset, despite its demonstrated utility. These data suggest that resident training in cholecystectomy is safe, but indicates missed opportunities to perform IOC and laparoscopic CBDE.
 


Session Number: SS04 – Quality Outcomes
Program Number: S019

Related



Hours & Info

15821 Ventura Blvd Ste 400
Encino, CA 91436

1-310-437-0544

[email protected]

Monday – Friday
8am to 5pm Pacific Time

Find Us Around the Web!

  • Bluesky
  • X
  • Instagram
  • Facebook
  • YouTube

Copyright © 2026 · SAGES · All Rights Reserved

Important Links

Healthy Sooner: Patient Information

SAGES Guidelines, Statements, & Standards of Practice

SAGES Manuals

Refine Search