• Skip to main content
  • Skip to header right navigation
  • Skip to site footer

Log in
  • Search
    • Search All SAGES Content
    • Search SAGES Guidelines
    • Search the Video Library
    • Search the Image Library
    • Search the Abstracts Archive
www.sages.org

SAGES

Reimagining surgical care for a healthier world

  • Home
    • Search
    • SAGES Home
    • SAGES Foundation Home
  • About
    • Awards
    • Who Is SAGES?
    • Leadership
    • Our Mission
    • Advocacy
    • Committees
      • SAGES Board of Governors
      • Officers and Representatives of the Society
      • Committee Chairs and Co-Chairs
      • Committee Rosters
      • SAGES Past Presidents
  • Meetings
    • SAGES NBT Innovation Weekend
    • SAGES Annual Meeting
      • 2026 Scientific Session Call for Abstracts
      • 2026 Emerging Technology Call for Abstracts
    • CME Claim Form
    • SAGES Past, Present, Future, and Related Meeting Information
    • SAGES Related Meetings & Events Calendar
  • Join SAGES!
    • Membership Application
    • Membership Benefits
    • Membership Types
      • Requirements and Applications for Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Affiliate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Associate Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Candidate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for International Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements for Medical Student Membership
    • Member Spotlight
    • Give the Gift of SAGES Membership
  • Patients
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Healthy Sooner – Patient Information for Minimally Invasive Surgery
    • Choosing Wisely – An Initiative of the ABIM Foundation
    • All in the Recovery: Colorectal Cancer Alliance
    • Find A SAGES Surgeon
  • Publications
    • Clinical / Practice / Training Guidelines, Statements, and Standards of Practice
    • Sustainability in Surgical Practice
    • SAGES Stories Podcast
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Patient Information From SAGES
    • TAVAC – Technology and Value Assessments
    • Surgical Endoscopy and Other Journal Information
    • SAGES Manuals
    • MesSAGES – The SAGES Newsletter
    • COVID-19 Archive
    • Troubleshooting Guides
  • Education
    • Wellness Resources – You Are Not Alone
    • Avoid Opiates After Surgery
    • SAGES Subscription Catalog
    • SAGES TV: Home of SAGES Surgical Videos
    • The SAGES Safe Cholecystectomy Program
    • Masters Program
    • Resident and Fellow Opportunities
      • MIS Fellows Course
      • SAGES Robotics Residents and Fellows Courses
      • SAGES Free Resident Webinar Series
      • Fluorescence-Guided Surgery Course for Fellows
      • Fellows’ Career Development Course
    • SAGES S.M.A.R.T. Enhanced Recovery Program
    • SAGES @ Cine-Med Products
      • SAGES Top 21 Minimally Invasive Procedures Every Practicing Surgeon Should Know
      • SAGES Pearls Step-by-Step
      • SAGES Flexible Endoscopy 101
    • SAGES OR SAFETY Video Activity
  • Opportunities
    • Fellowship Recognition Opportunities
    • SAGES Advanced Flexible Endoscopy Area of Concentrated Training (ACT) SEAL
    • Multi-Society Foregut Fellowship Certification
    • Research Opportunities
    • FLS
    • FES
    • FUSE
    • Jobs Board
    • SAGES Go Global: Global Affairs and Humanitarian Efforts
  • OWLS/FLS
You are here: Home / Abstracts / Adding fragility to the FLS tasks improves the accuracy of assessing laparoscopic skills

Adding fragility to the FLS tasks improves the accuracy of assessing laparoscopic skills

Yusuke Watanabe, MD1, Yo Kurashima, MD1, Elif Bilgic, MSc2, Saseem Poudel, MD1, Tomoko MIzota, MD1, Shinichiro Yokohama, MD1, Toshiaki Shichinohe, MD1, Satoshi Hiring, MD1. 1Department of Gastroenterological surgery II, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, 2Steinberg-Bernstein Centre for Minimally Invasive Surgery and Innovation, McGill University Health Centre

Introduction: The Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery (FLS) program has successfully been used to teach and assess basic skills required to perform laparoscopic surgery. The more popular the FLS became, the score difference between surgeons and surgical trainees has been less significant. The purpose of this pilot study was to evaluate the impact of adding fragility to the FLS tasks’ models on the accuracy of assessing laparoscopic skills.

Methods: Minimally invasive surgeons (MIS) and general surgeons/surgical trainees (GS) completed modified FLS tasks; the peg transfer (PEG) task and the intracorporeal suturing (ICS) task, in addition to the original two tasks. The agar-based pegs were used for the modified PEG task and Kimwipes wipers (non-woven papers) were used instead of penrose drains for the ICS task. For the original tasks, scores were calculated based on the standard FLS scoring system (time and accuracy). In addition to the accuracy component of the standard scoring system, the degree of damages to the modified tasks was scored. Scores were compared between the MIS group and GS group using Wilcoxon signed-rank test. The correlation between modified task scores and original task scores was estimated using Spearman’s correlation coefficient. Data are expressed as median score and interquartile range.

Results: A total of 11 subjects (5 MIS, 6 GS) completed the tasks (mean age 36; 82% male). The MIS and GS groups scored 250[213; 257] vs. 232[214; 239] (p=0.41) on the original PEG task and 515[440; 537] vs. 449[400; 480] (p=0.17) on the original ICS task. The time scores and accuracy scores on the original tasks had no significant difference between the groups. Compared to the GS group, the MIS group had significantly greater scores on modified tasks (PEG 103[40; 144] vs. 0[0; 8], p=0.01 and ICS 494[446; 526] vs. 430[383; 452], p=0.04). The differences in performances were due to better scores for the MIS group on the time and accuracy scores of the PEG task (time p= 0.01, accuracy p= 0.04) and the accuracy scores of the ICS task (p= 0.03). While modified ICS task scores correlated strongly with original task scores (r=0.93, p< 0.001), there was no significant correlation between scores on the PEG task.

Conclusions: The preliminary data shows that adding another component to the FLS scoring system can improve the accuracy of assessing laparoscopic skills. Increasing the fragility of the models could take the FLS manual skills assessment to the next level.


Presented at the SAGES 2017 Annual Meeting in Houston, TX.

Abstract ID: 79792

Program Number: P285

Presentation Session: Poster (Non CME)

Presentation Type: Poster

190

Share this:

  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window) Pocket
  • Click to share on Mastodon (Opens in new window) Mastodon
  • Click to share on Threads (Opens in new window) Threads
  • Click to share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky

Related


sages_adbutler_leaderboard

Hours & Info

11300 West Olympic Blvd, Suite 600
Los Angeles, CA 90064

1-310-437-0544

[email protected]

Monday – Friday
8am to 5pm Pacific Time

Find Us Around the Web!

  • Bluesky
  • X
  • Instagram
  • Facebook
  • YouTube

Copyright © 2025 · SAGES · All Rights Reserved

Important Links

Healthy Sooner: Patient Information

SAGES Guidelines, Statements, & Standards of Practice

SAGES Manuals