• Skip to main content
  • Skip to header right navigation
  • Skip to site footer

Log in
  • Search
    • Search All SAGES Content
    • Search SAGES Guidelines
    • Search the Video Library
    • Search the Image Library
    • Search the Abstracts Archive
www.sages.org

SAGES

Reimagining surgical care for a healthier world

  • Home
    • Search
    • SAGES Home
    • SAGES Foundation Home
  • About
    • Awards
    • Who Is SAGES?
    • Leadership
    • Our Mission
    • Advocacy
    • Committees
      • SAGES Board of Governors
      • Officers and Representatives of the Society
      • Committee Chairs and Co-Chairs
      • Committee Rosters
      • SAGES Past Presidents
  • Meetings
    • SAGES NBT Innovation Weekend
    • SAGES Annual Meeting
      • 2026 Scientific Session Call for Abstracts
      • 2026 Emerging Technology Call for Abstracts
    • CME Claim Form
    • SAGES Past, Present, Future, and Related Meeting Information
    • SAGES Related Meetings & Events Calendar
  • Join SAGES!
    • Membership Application
    • Membership Benefits
    • Membership Types
      • Requirements and Applications for Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Affiliate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Associate Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Candidate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for International Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements for Medical Student Membership
    • Member Spotlight
    • Give the Gift of SAGES Membership
  • Patients
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Healthy Sooner – Patient Information for Minimally Invasive Surgery
    • Choosing Wisely – An Initiative of the ABIM Foundation
    • All in the Recovery: Colorectal Cancer Alliance
    • Find A SAGES Surgeon
  • Publications
    • Clinical / Practice / Training Guidelines, Statements, and Standards of Practice
    • Sustainability in Surgical Practice
    • SAGES Stories Podcast
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Patient Information From SAGES
    • TAVAC – Technology and Value Assessments
    • Surgical Endoscopy and Other Journal Information
    • SAGES Manuals
    • MesSAGES – The SAGES Newsletter
    • COVID-19 Archive
    • Troubleshooting Guides
  • Education
    • Wellness Resources – You Are Not Alone
    • Avoid Opiates After Surgery
    • SAGES Subscription Catalog
    • SAGES TV: Home of SAGES Surgical Videos
    • The SAGES Safe Cholecystectomy Program
    • Masters Program
    • Resident and Fellow Opportunities
      • MIS Fellows Course
      • SAGES Robotics Residents and Fellows Courses
      • SAGES Free Resident Webinar Series
      • Fluorescence-Guided Surgery Course for Fellows
      • Fellows’ Career Development Course
    • SAGES S.M.A.R.T. Enhanced Recovery Program
    • SAGES @ Cine-Med Products
      • SAGES Top 21 Minimally Invasive Procedures Every Practicing Surgeon Should Know
      • SAGES Pearls Step-by-Step
      • SAGES Flexible Endoscopy 101
    • SAGES OR SAFETY Video Activity
  • Opportunities
    • Fellowship Recognition Opportunities
    • SAGES Advanced Flexible Endoscopy Area of Concentrated Training (ACT) SEAL
    • Multi-Society Foregut Fellowship Certification
    • Research Opportunities
    • FLS
    • FES
    • FUSE
    • Jobs Board
    • SAGES Go Global: Global Affairs and Humanitarian Efforts
  • OWLS/FLS
You are here: Home / Abstracts / A Systematic Review of Anastomotic Leakage Associated Risk Factors Following Laparoscopic Anterior Resection

A Systematic Review of Anastomotic Leakage Associated Risk Factors Following Laparoscopic Anterior Resection

Shayan Arshed, MBBS, MSc1, Emin Amiraslanov1, Romi Navaratnam2, Bijendra Patel1. 1Barts Cancer Institute, 2North Middlesex University Hospital

Introduction:

Anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer resection is a dire complication associated with local recurrence, morbidity, and mortality. Unlike conventional open approach, literature on risk factors for leakage after laparoscopic colorectal surgery is only limited; and there is no consensus on the important risk factors. The aim of this systematic review was to identify and evaluate the risk factors leading to anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic anterior resection.

Methods and Procedures:

A descriptive review was designed using following databases for literature search: MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Knowledge, Cochrane Library and the reference lists of relevant articles. Relevant free text words and MeSH terms, with Boolean operators were used and an explicit inclusion and exclusion criteria was adapted for screening.

Results:

A total of 11 studies were included. The evaluation found an overall anastomotic leakage rate of 6.9% (227/3299). Following risk factors (Table) showed high incidence of leakage:

Risk Factors Leading to Leakage
No. Risk Factor Total Patients Overall Incidence of Leakage (%)
1 Male Gender 1732 153 (8.8)
2 ASA Class III 167 15 (9)
3 Advanced Tumour Stage (TNM ≥ III) 381 52 (7.6)
4 Large Tumour Size (≥ 4 cm) 1167 101 (8.7)
5

Low Tumour Location (≤ 10 cm from anal verge)

929 85 (9.1)
6 Multiple Firings of Linear Stapler (≥ 3) 226 33 (14.6)
7

Level of Anastomosis (≤ 5 cm from anal verge)

143 24 (16.8)
8

Long Operative Times (≥ 220 min)

1152 109 (9.5)
9

Preoperative Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation

318 29 (9.1)
10

Perioperative Blood Transfusion

121 27 (22.3)
11

Conversion to Open Surgery

44 5 (11.4)
12

Splenic Flexure Mobilisation done

1102 85 (7.7)

Patients with a protective stoma and those operated in the 2nd half of the study time period showed a low incidence of leakage (4.9%, 23/367 and 7.6%, 22/288 respectively).

Conclusions:

Based on best available evidence; male gender, patient with severe systemic disease or in worse condition, advanced tumour stage, large tumour, low lying tumour, multiple stapler firings, low anastomosis, long operative time, preoperative chemoradiation, blood transfusion, conversion to open surgery and mobilising the splenic flexure are important risk factors leading to leakage. However, improved surgeon learning curve and diverting stoma reduce the incidence of leakage. Awareness of these 12 leakage causing risk factors will help devise individualised treatment plans for patients; such as a defunctioning stoma might be mandatory if one or more of these important risk factors are present, as this might avert leakage.

199

Share this:

  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window) Pocket
  • Click to share on Mastodon (Opens in new window) Mastodon
  • Click to share on Threads (Opens in new window) Threads
  • Click to share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky

Related


sages_adbutler_leaderboard

Hours & Info

11300 West Olympic Blvd, Suite 600
Los Angeles, CA 90064

1-310-437-0544

[email protected]

Monday – Friday
8am to 5pm Pacific Time

Find Us Around the Web!

  • Bluesky
  • X
  • Instagram
  • Facebook
  • YouTube

Copyright © 2025 · SAGES · All Rights Reserved

Important Links

Healthy Sooner: Patient Information

SAGES Guidelines, Statements, & Standards of Practice

SAGES Manuals