• Skip to main content
  • Skip to header right navigation
  • Skip to site footer

Log in
www.sages.org

SAGES

Reimagining surgical care for a healthier world

  • Home
    • SAGES Home
    • SAGES Foundation Home
  • About
    • Awards
    • Who Is SAGES?
    • Leadership
    • Our Mission
    • Advocacy
    • Committees
      • SAGES Board of Governors
      • Officers and Representatives of the Society
      • Committee Chairs and Co-Chairs
      • Committee Rosters
      • SAGES Past Presidents
    • Why Should You Support SAGES?
    • SAGES Swag
  • Meetings
    • SAGES NBT Innovation Weekend
    • SAGES Annual Meeting
      • 2026 Annual Meeting
      • 2027 Scientific Session Call for Abstracts
      • 2027 Emerging Technology Call for Abstracts
    • CME Claim Form
    • SAGES Past, Present, Future, and Related Meeting Information
    • SAGES Related Meetings & Events Calendar
  • Join SAGES!
    • Membership Application
    • Membership Benefits
    • Membership Types
      • Requirements and Applications for Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Affiliate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Associate Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Candidate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for International Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements for Medical Student Membership
    • Member Spotlight
    • Give the Gift of SAGES Membership
  • Patients
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Healthy Sooner – Patient Information for Minimally Invasive Surgery
    • Choosing Wisely – An Initiative of the ABIM Foundation
    • All in the Recovery: Colorectal Cancer Alliance
    • Find A SAGES Surgeon
  • Publications
    • Clinical / Practice / Training Guidelines, Statements, and Standards of Practice
    • Sustainability in Surgical Practice
    • SAGES Stories Podcast
    • SAGES Lead Up Podcast
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Patient Information From SAGES
    • TAVAC – Technology and Value Assessments
    • Surgical Endoscopy and Other Journal Information
    • Innovative Surgical Trends
    • SAGES Manuals
    • MesSAGES – The SAGES Newsletter
    • COVID-19 Archive
    • Troubleshooting Guides
  • Education
    • Wellness Resources – You Are Not Alone
    • Avoid Opiates After Surgery
    • SAGES Subscription Catalog
    • SAGES TV: Home of SAGES Surgical Videos
    • The SAGES Safe Cholecystectomy Program
    • Masters Program
    • Resident and Fellow Opportunities
      • MIS Fellows Course
      • SAGES Robotics Residents and Fellows Courses
      • SAGES Free Resident Webinar Series
      • Advanced Laparoscopy and Fluorescence-Guided Surgery Course for Fellows
      • Fellows’ Career Development Course
    • SAGES S.M.A.R.T. Enhanced Recovery Program
    • SAGES @ Cine-Med Products
      • SAGES Top 21 Minimally Invasive Procedures Every Practicing Surgeon Should Know
      • SAGES Pearls Step-by-Step
      • SAGES Flexible Endoscopy 101
    • SAGES OR SAFETY Video Activity
    • Foregut Video Atlas
  • Opportunities
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Fellowship Recognition Opportunities
    • SAGES Advanced Flexible Endoscopy Area of Concentrated Training (ACT) SEAL
    • Multi-Society Foregut Fellowship Certification
    • Research Opportunities
    • FLS
    • FES
    • FUSE
    • Jobs Board
    • SAGES Go Global: Global Affairs
  • Learning Hub
You are here: Home / Abstracts / A Prospective Randomized Trial Comparing Totally Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy With Laparoscopy-Assisted Distal Gastrectomy in Early Gastric Cancer

A Prospective Randomized Trial Comparing Totally Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy With Laparoscopy-Assisted Distal Gastrectomy in Early Gastric Cancer

Joo-ho Lee, MD PhD, Joo Hyun Woo, MD. Ewha Womans University School of Medicine

 

INTRODUCTION Most surgeons have performed laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy (LADG) with extracorporeal anastomosis rather than total laparoscopic procedures because of the technical difficulties of intracorporeal anastomosis. However, recently totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (TLDG) has been reported to be safe, technically feasible, and more minimally invasive. We conducted this study to compare the short-term outcomes of LADG with TLDG to provide the basis for standardization of laparoscopic gastrectomy in early gastric cancer.
METHODS AND PROCEDURES In this prospective study, 35 patients with early gastric cancer were randomized to either TLDG or LADG with Billroth II anastomosis from February to August 2001. Clinicopathologic characteristics, operative details, postoperative course and quality of life were compared between two groups. Postoperative pain intensity at rest was measured on 100-mm visual analogue scale during hospital stay. Test of pulmonary function was performed on preoperative day and postoperative day 4. Quality of life was assessed using EORTC QLQ-C30, version 3 and the gastric module STO22 on first visit for follow-up after discharge. Approval of the institutional review board and written informed consent were obtained.
RESULTS 

  TLDG (n=18)  LADG (n=17)  P-value
Operative details      
Operative time (min) 131.3±90.3 233.1±42.0 0.08
Estimated blood loss (mL) 131.3±90.3 153.8±82.8 0.50
Stapler devices used 4.2±1.1  2.0±0.0 0.01

The longest length of woundafter skin closure (cm)

3.3±1.4  5.2±1.1 0.02
Postoperative course      
Postoperative pain score
on day 5 
2.5±7.1 2.0±4.2  0.85
 
Opioid consumption
added to intravenous PCA 
1.9±2.5  2.6±1.8 0.51
 
First flatus (days) 3.1±1.0 2.8±0.9  0.56
Liquid diet (days)   4.2±1.1 3.8±0.7 0.34
Postoperative hospital stay (days) 8.1±3.1 7.4±1.7  0.49
Pulmonary function      
Decreased forced vital capacity (%) 19.8±12.3  20.8±17.0  0.87
Decreased forced expiratory volume
in 1 second (%)  
15.4±10.6 16.7±12.0 0.75
Quality of life
 
     
Physical function  81.7±6.4 67.5±13.5 0.03
Global health 66.7±13.6 61.5±14.7 0.57
Pain and discomfort   22.2±20.3 29.2±10.2 0.56
Emotional problem  22.2±15.7  27.8±16.8 0.59
Restriction of eating  27.1±18.5  27.8±16.8 0.84
Body image 24.9±31.9  29.2±27.8 0.82

CONCLUSION(S) This study suggests that TLDG with Billroth II anastomosis was safe and feasible as LADG in early gastric cancer. The statistically significant beneficial effect of TLDG were smaller wound below umbilicus compared with epigastric wound after LADG and more healthy physical function of quality of life. Our study is ongoing to overcome the limitation of small sample size.
 


Session Number: Poster – Poster Presentations
Program Number: P617
View Poster

Related



Hours & Info

15821 Ventura Blvd Ste 400
Encino, CA 91436

1-310-437-0544

[email protected]

Monday – Friday
8am to 5pm Pacific Time

Find Us Around the Web!

  • Bluesky
  • X
  • Instagram
  • Facebook
  • YouTube

Copyright © 2026 · SAGES · All Rights Reserved

Important Links

Healthy Sooner: Patient Information

SAGES Guidelines, Statements, & Standards of Practice

SAGES Manuals

Refine Search