• Skip to main content
  • Skip to header right navigation
  • Skip to site footer

Log in
www.sages.org

SAGES

Reimagining surgical care for a healthier world

  • Home
    • SAGES Home
    • SAGES Foundation Home
  • About
    • Awards
    • Who Is SAGES?
    • Leadership
    • Our Mission
    • Advocacy
    • Committees
      • SAGES Board of Governors
      • Officers and Representatives of the Society
      • Committee Chairs and Co-Chairs
      • Committee Rosters
      • SAGES Past Presidents
    • Why Should You Support SAGES?
    • SAGES Swag
  • Meetings
    • SAGES NBT Innovation Weekend
    • SAGES Annual Meeting
      • 2026 Annual Meeting
      • 2027 Scientific Session Call for Abstracts
      • 2027 Emerging Technology Call for Abstracts
    • CME Claim Form
    • SAGES Past, Present, Future, and Related Meeting Information
    • SAGES Related Meetings & Events Calendar
  • Join SAGES!
    • Membership Application
    • Membership Benefits
    • Membership Types
      • Requirements and Applications for Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Affiliate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Associate Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Candidate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for International Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements for Medical Student Membership
    • Member Spotlight
    • Give the Gift of SAGES Membership
  • Patients
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Healthy Sooner – Patient Information for Minimally Invasive Surgery
    • Choosing Wisely – An Initiative of the ABIM Foundation
    • All in the Recovery: Colorectal Cancer Alliance
    • Find A SAGES Surgeon
  • Publications
    • Clinical / Practice / Training Guidelines, Statements, and Standards of Practice
    • Sustainability in Surgical Practice
    • SAGES Stories Podcast
    • SAGES Lead Up Podcast
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Patient Information From SAGES
    • TAVAC – Technology and Value Assessments
    • Surgical Endoscopy and Other Journal Information
    • Innovative Surgical Trends
    • SAGES Manuals
    • MesSAGES – The SAGES Newsletter
    • COVID-19 Archive
    • Troubleshooting Guides
  • Education
    • Wellness Resources – You Are Not Alone
    • Avoid Opiates After Surgery
    • SAGES Subscription Catalog
    • SAGES TV: Home of SAGES Surgical Videos
    • The SAGES Safe Cholecystectomy Program
    • Masters Program
    • Resident and Fellow Opportunities
      • MIS Fellows Course
      • SAGES Robotics Residents and Fellows Courses
      • SAGES Free Resident Webinar Series
      • Advanced Laparoscopy and Fluorescence-Guided Surgery Course for Fellows
      • Fellows’ Career Development Course
    • SAGES S.M.A.R.T. Enhanced Recovery Program
    • SAGES @ Cine-Med Products
      • SAGES Top 21 Minimally Invasive Procedures Every Practicing Surgeon Should Know
      • SAGES Pearls Step-by-Step
      • SAGES Flexible Endoscopy 101
    • SAGES OR SAFETY Video Activity
    • Foregut Video Atlas
  • Opportunities
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Fellowship Recognition Opportunities
    • SAGES Advanced Flexible Endoscopy Area of Concentrated Training (ACT) SEAL
    • Multi-Society Foregut Fellowship Certification
    • Research Opportunities
    • FLS
    • FES
    • FUSE
    • Jobs Board
    • SAGES Go Global: Global Affairs
  • Learning Hub
You are here: Home / Abstracts / A Novel Sensorized Instrument-based Minimally Invasive Surgery (simis) Tool: Initial Construct Validation of Force Sensing

A Novel Sensorized Instrument-based Minimally Invasive Surgery (simis) Tool: Initial Construct Validation of Force Sensing

Objective: A novel sensorized laparoscopic instrument capable of sensing forces acting at the instrument tip in 5 degrees of freedom (DOF) as well as position in 6 DOF was evaluated. The purpose of this research was to demonstrate that the force sensing component is construct valid as evidenced by different force profiles between novice and expert laparoscopic surgeons.

Methods: Using an FLS trainer, eight Novice and 12 Expert laparoscopists performed the FLS suturing task using the novel instruments. The suturing task was broken down into three subtasks: Task 1, needle preparation; Task 2, needle driving; and Task 3, knot tying (3 throws per task). A novel MIS instrument with force sensors at its tip was used to compare their force profiles as indicated by force exertion over the total task and subtasks. Forces over the 5 DOFs were summarized as Total Force (magnitude of sum of forces in x, y, and z directions), Grasp Force, and Torsion. Normality was assessed using the d’Agostino-Pearson omnibus test. Gaussian force data were compared using the Student’s t-test and non-Gaussian data were compared using the Mann-Whitney test. Data are presented as means ± SD or medians ± interquartile range.

Results: In general, novices tended to be more erratic in their use of force in all 5 DOFs while experts generally tended to use little to no force for the bulk of the task until suddenly dramatically increasing their force exertion — especially in the x-direction and the grasp readings — when cinching down the three throws. There was a trend forExpertsto exert alower mean force over the course of the procedure thanNovices (0.73 N ± 0.30 vs. 0.91 N ± 0.32, p = 0.046). Experts exerted a significantly higher mean grasp force over the course of the procedure than Novices (21.84 N ± 6.87 vs. 15.14 N ± 7.17, p = 0.025). There were no differences between Novices and Experts for median torsion over the course of the procedure (0.03 N.cm, 0.02–0.08 vs. 0.03 N.cm, 0.02–0.05, p = 0.3080). Significant differences were demonstrated for Task 1 (1.00 N vs. 0.70 N, 0.48–0.88, p = 0.0294) with Novices exerting more total force than Experts. Similarly, for Task 3, knot tying, Novices demonstrated significantly greater total force than Experts (1.05 N, 0.59–1.22, vs. 0.65 N, 0.53–0.81, p = 0.0263). The results of subtask analysis for grasp force demonstrated non significant trends with Experts exerting greater force than Novices for Tasks 1 and 2. Considering all knots tied, expert surgeons used significantly more force than Novices (9.98 N, 5.58–19.83, vs. 22.62 N, 17.81–32.07, p < 0.0001). Subtask analysis for torsion did not show any significant differences.

Conclusions: The novel minimally invasive surgical instrument is construct-valid and capable of detecting differences in force exertion between novices and experts in the FLS suturing task. Further evaluation is mandated to better understand the ability to predict performance based on force as well as the potential for new metrics in minimally invasive surgical education.


Session: Podium Presentation

Program Number: S036

Related



Hours & Info

15821 Ventura Blvd Ste 400
Encino, CA 91436

1-310-437-0544

[email protected]

Monday – Friday
8am to 5pm Pacific Time

Find Us Around the Web!

  • Bluesky
  • X
  • Instagram
  • Facebook
  • YouTube

Copyright © 2026 · SAGES · All Rights Reserved

Important Links

Healthy Sooner: Patient Information

SAGES Guidelines, Statements, & Standards of Practice

SAGES Manuals

Refine Search