• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

SAGES

Reimagining surgical care for a healthier world

  • Home
    • Search
    • SAGES Home
    • SAGES Foundation Home
  • About
    • Who is SAGES?
    • Leadership
    • SAGES Mission Statement
    • Advocacy
    • Committees
      • Request to Join a SAGES Committee
      • SAGES Board of Governors
      • Officers and Representatives of the Society
      • Committee Chairs and Co-Chairs
      • Full Committee Rosters
      • SAGES Past Presidents
    • Donate to the SAGES Foundation
    • SAGES Store
    • Awards
      • George Berci Award
      • Pioneer in Surgical Endoscopy
      • Excellence In Clinical Care
      • International Ambassador
      • IRCAD Visiting Fellowship
      • Social Justice and Health Equity
      • Excellence in Community Surgery
      • Distinguished Service
      • Early Career Researcher
      • Researcher in Training
      • Jeff Ponsky Master Educator
      • Excellence in Medical Leadership
      • Barbara Berci Memorial Award
      • Brandeis Scholarship
      • Advocacy Summit
      • RAFT Annual Meeting Abstract Contest and Awards
    • “Unofficial” Logo Products
  • Meetings
    • NBT Innovation Weekend
    • SAGES Annual Meeting
      • 2026 Scientific Session Call For Abstracts
      • 2026 Emerging Technology Call For Abstracts
    • CME Claim Form
    • Industry
      • Advertising Opportunities
    • Future Meetings
    • Related Meetings Calendar
  • Join SAGES!
    • Membership Benefits
    • Membership Applications
      • Active Membership
      • Affiliate Membership
      • Associate Active Membership
      • Candidate Membership
      • International Membership
      • Medical Student Membership
    • Member News
      • Member Spotlight
      • Give the Gift of SAGES Membership
  • Patients
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Healthy Sooner – Patient Information for Minimally Invasive Surgery
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Choosing Wisely – An Initiative of the ABIM Foundation
    • All in the Recovery: Colorectal Cancer Alliance
    • Find a SAGES Member
  • Publications
    • Sustainability in Surgical Practice
    • SAGES Stories Podcast
    • SAGES Clinical / Practice / Training Guidelines, Statements, and Standards of Practice
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • TAVAC – Technology and Value Assessments
    • Surgical Endoscopy and Other Journal Information
    • SAGES Manuals
    • SCOPE – The SAGES Newsletter
    • COVID-19 Annoucements
    • Troubleshooting Guides
  • Education
    • Wellness Resources – You Are Not Alone
    • OpiVoid.org
    • SAGES Video Subscription
    • SAGES.TV Video Library
    • Safe Cholecystectomy Program
      • Safe Cholecystectomy Didactic Modules
    • Masters Program
      • SAGES Facebook Program Collaboratives
      • Acute Care Surgery
      • Bariatric
      • Biliary
      • Colorectal
      • Flexible Endoscopy (upper or lower)
      • Foregut
      • Hernia
      • Robotics
    • Free Webinars For Residents
    • Educational Opportunities
    • HPB/Solid Organ Program
    • Fluorescence-Guided Surgery Course for Fellows
    • Fellows Career Development Course
    • Robotics Fellows Course
    • MIS Fellows Course
    • SMART Enhanced Recovery Program
    • SAGES OR SAFETY Video
    • SAGES Top 21 MIS Procedures
    • SAGES Pearls
    • SAGES Flexible Endoscopy 101
    • SAGES Tips & Tricks of the Top 21
  • Opportunities
    • Area of Concentrated Training Seal (ACT)-Advanced Flexible Endoscopy
    • SAGES Fellowship Recognition Opportunities
    • Multi-Society Foregut Fellowship Certification
    • SAGES Research Opportunities
    • Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery
    • Fundamentals of Endoscopic Surgery
    • Fundamental Use of Surgical Energy
    • Job Board
    • SAGES Go Global: Global Affairs and Humanitarian Efforts
  • Search
    • Search All SAGES Content
    • Search SAGES Guidelines
    • Search the Video Library
    • Search the Image Library
    • Search the Abstracts Archive
  • OWLS / FLS
  • Log In

A Novel and Precise Evaluation Model for Psychomotor Skills in Endoscopic Surgery

Purpose: Psychomotor skill is absolutely necessary for endoscopic surgeons. We devised tasks and parameters to evaluate psychomotor skills during endoscopic surgery and investigated their validity.
Methods: Sixteen novice medical students (N) and ten expert surgeons (E) whohad performed over 50 endoscopic surgeries participated in the study. We evaluated psychomotor skill by asking the participants to move forceps in a straight-line space. Three-dimensional position measurements of the forcep tips were analyzed with an electromagnetic tracking system (AURORA; Northern Digital Inc. CANADA). The following parameters were evaluated: efficiency of spatial distance, summation of spatial deviation, integration of deviation, motatsuki time, and motatsuki distance. Motatsuki means hesitation in achieving the desired goal point. Data are expressed as mean ± SD. A two-way repeated measure ANOVA and the Bonferroni method for multiple comparisons were used to identify differences at a significance level of p < 0.05.
Results: There was no difference in the efficiency of spatial distance with the dominant (right) hand (N, 1.8 } 0.8; E, 1.2 } 0.1) but there was a significant difference (p < 0.001) with the non-dominant (left) hand (N:1.7 } 0.2; E:1.2 } 0.1). The summation spatial distance (mm) between the dominant (N:716.1 } 425.2; E:130.9 } 137.0) and the non-dominant hands (N:579.1 } 176.8; E: 119.7 } 87.4) was significantly different (p < 0.05). Moreover, the integration of spatial distance (mm2) was significantly different (p < 0.01) between the dominant (N:929.9 } 374.8; E:319.9 } 137.0) and non-dominant hands (N:790.2 }141.7; E:258.4 } 102.0). The motatsuki time (s) of the dominant (N:1.1 } 0.4, E:0.5} 0.2, p < 0.05) and non-dominant (N:1.0} 0.2; E:0.6 } 0.3, p < 0.01) hands was significantly different. The motatsuki distance (mm) of the dominant hand (N:25.6 } 4.4; E:19.7} 3.7) was significantly different (p < 0.05) but there was no difference with the non-dominant hand (N:22.4 } 4.0; E:18.4 } 2.1).
Conclusions: Our evaluation task model discriminated the level of psychomotor skill required for safe and precise endoscopic surgery. We suggest that the dexterity required for endoscopy can be evaluated using this simple and sensitive testing procedure.


Session: Poster

Program Number: P249

View Poster

64

Share this:

  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window) Pocket
  • Click to share on Mastodon (Opens in new window) Mastodon

Related



  • Foundation
  • SAGES.TV
  • MyCME
  • Educational Activities

Copyright © 2025 Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons