• Skip to main content
  • Skip to header right navigation
  • Skip to site footer

Log in
www.sages.org

SAGES

Reimagining surgical care for a healthier world

  • Home
    • SAGES Home
    • SAGES Foundation Home
  • About
    • Awards
    • Who Is SAGES?
    • Leadership
    • Our Mission
    • Advocacy
    • Committees
      • SAGES Board of Governors
      • Officers and Representatives of the Society
      • Committee Chairs and Co-Chairs
      • Committee Rosters
      • SAGES Past Presidents
    • Why Should You Support SAGES?
    • SAGES Swag
  • Meetings
    • SAGES NBT Innovation Weekend
    • SAGES Annual Meeting
      • 2026 Annual Meeting
      • 2027 Scientific Session Call for Abstracts
      • 2027 Emerging Technology Call for Abstracts
    • CME Claim Form
    • SAGES Past, Present, Future, and Related Meeting Information
    • SAGES Related Meetings & Events Calendar
  • Join SAGES!
    • Membership Application
    • Membership Benefits
    • Membership Types
      • Requirements and Applications for Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Affiliate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Associate Active Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for Candidate Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements and Applications for International Membership in SAGES
      • Requirements for Medical Student Membership
    • Member Spotlight
    • Give the Gift of SAGES Membership
  • Patients
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Healthy Sooner – Patient Information for Minimally Invasive Surgery
    • Choosing Wisely – An Initiative of the ABIM Foundation
    • All in the Recovery: Colorectal Cancer Alliance
    • Find A SAGES Surgeon
  • Publications
    • Clinical / Practice / Training Guidelines, Statements, and Standards of Practice
    • Sustainability in Surgical Practice
    • SAGES Stories Podcast
    • SAGES Lead Up Podcast
    • Patient Information Brochures
    • Patient Information From SAGES
    • TAVAC – Technology and Value Assessments
    • Surgical Endoscopy and Other Journal Information
    • Innovative Surgical Trends
    • SAGES Manuals
    • MesSAGES – The SAGES Newsletter
    • COVID-19 Archive
    • Troubleshooting Guides
  • Education
    • Wellness Resources – You Are Not Alone
    • Avoid Opiates After Surgery
    • SAGES Subscription Catalog
    • SAGES TV: Home of SAGES Surgical Videos
    • The SAGES Safe Cholecystectomy Program
    • Masters Program
    • Resident and Fellow Opportunities
      • MIS Fellows Course
      • SAGES Robotics Residents and Fellows Courses
      • SAGES Free Resident Webinar Series
      • Advanced Laparoscopy and Fluorescence-Guided Surgery Course for Fellows
      • Fellows’ Career Development Course
    • SAGES S.M.A.R.T. Enhanced Recovery Program
    • SAGES @ Cine-Med Products
      • SAGES Top 21 Minimally Invasive Procedures Every Practicing Surgeon Should Know
      • SAGES Pearls Step-by-Step
      • SAGES Flexible Endoscopy 101
    • SAGES OR SAFETY Video Activity
    • Foregut Video Atlas
  • Opportunities
    • Join the SAGES Patient Partner Network (PPN)
    • Fellowship Recognition Opportunities
    • SAGES Advanced Flexible Endoscopy Area of Concentrated Training (ACT) SEAL
    • Multi-Society Foregut Fellowship Certification
    • Research Opportunities
    • FLS
    • FES
    • FUSE
    • Jobs Board
    • SAGES Go Global: Global Affairs
  • Learning Hub
You are here: Home / Abstracts / A Comparison of Pre-operative Comorbidities and Post-operative Outcomes Among Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Nissen Fundoplicaiton At High and Low Volume Centers

A Comparison of Pre-operative Comorbidities and Post-operative Outcomes Among Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Nissen Fundoplicaiton At High and Low Volume Centers

Objective: Peer reviewed data is often published by single centers that are affiliated with teaching institutions with a high volume of cases. As operations grow in popularity, they are performed at a wide variety of institutions with the potential to produce inconsistent results. The purpose of this study is to compare pre-operative comorbidities and post-operative outcomes between patients that have undergone laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication (LNF) at high and low volume centers across North Carolina.

Methods: This is a retrospective study using the North Carolina Hospital Association Patient Data System database. Selected patients include adults (>17 years old) that have undergone laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Patients that underwent operative management for emergent purposes, or had associated diagnoses of esophageal cancer or achalasia were excluded from the study. High volume centers are defined as institutions that performed ten or more LNFs per year averaged over a period of four years. Comparative statistics are performed on a number of variables between high and low volume centers.

Results: A total of 1019 patients underwent laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication for GERD in North Carolina between 2004 and 2008. High volume centers performed 530 LNFs (52%) while low volume centers performed 489 LNFs (48%). Patients at high volume centers were older (52.5 yo vs. 49.0 yo, p=0.019), had a higher incidence of diabetes (13.4% vs. 8.8%, p=0.026), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (5.1% vs. 2 %, p=0.015), hyperlipidemia (9.6% vs. 4.7%, p=0.004) and cystic fibrosis (2.8% vs 0.8%, p=0.03). Patients with a history of transplantation were also more likely to undergo LNF at a high volume center (15.8% vs. 1.6%, p=3.1 x10-15). There were no deaths among the two groups and also no difference between median length of stay (2 days). Low volume centers had a higher incidence of intraoperative accidental puncture or laceration (3.3% vs. 0.9%, p=0.017) while high volume centers had a higher incidence of pulmonary collapse (5.3% vs 2.5%, p=0.031).

Conclusions: Patients undergoing LNF at high volume centers tend to be older and have more comorbidities than patients at low volume centers. Although there was a higher incidence of intraoperative accidental puncture or laceration among patients at the low volume centers, there was no difference between median length of stay and there was no associated mortality. Although patient selection and complications are different, overall outcomes are the same at high and low volume centers.


Session: Poster of Distinction

Program Number: P007

View Poster

Related



Hours & Info

15821 Ventura Blvd Ste 400
Encino, CA 91436

1-310-437-0544

[email protected]

Monday – Friday
8am to 5pm Pacific Time

Find Us Around the Web!

  • Bluesky
  • X
  • Instagram
  • Facebook
  • YouTube

Copyright © 2026 · SAGES · All Rights Reserved

Important Links

Healthy Sooner: Patient Information

SAGES Guidelines, Statements, & Standards of Practice

SAGES Manuals

Refine Search