Bariatric Surgery Outcomes for Patients Undergoing Preoperative Ivc Filter Placement

Introduction: Pulmonary embolism remains a major risk after bariatric surgery. Current practice is to identify those patients who are at high risk for VTE and treat with preoperative inferior vena cava (IVC) filter to prevent postoperative pulmonary embolism. The purpose of this study is to analyze the postoperative complications observed in a large series of patients receiving a preoperative IVC filter.

Methods: A private insurance claims database was used to identity 17,434 patients who underwent bariatric surgery from 2002-2006. Of these patients, 972 were found to have a preoperative IVC filter placed. Seven hundred eight-nine patients from this cohort were case matched, based on age, sex, type of surgery, and pre-existing VTE, to non-IVC filter patients from the same database (n=1578). A multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed on the data to identify significant differences between the cohorts.

Results: Seventy percent of patients underwent open gastric bypass, 22.8% underwent laparoscopic gastric bypass, and 7.1% underwent laparoscopic adjustable band. Patients with IVC filters had a higher incidence of postoperative complications (OR 1.67, p < 0.0001), bleeding (OR 2.98, p < 0.0001), and DVT (OR 2.01, p < 0.0001). There was no difference between the two groups when comparing the relative risk of mortality, postoperative pulmonary embolism, cardiovascular, respiratory, gastrointestinal, or genitourinary complications, surgical site infections or re-operation.

Conclusions: This study serves as the largest retrospective analysis of bariatric surgery patients who underwent preoperative IVC filter placement in the literature to date. While complication rates were higher in those who underwent a preoperative IVC filter, it appears that mortality rates for both groups are equivalent. The presence of an IVC filter appears to be protective for high risk patients, as the risk of pulmonary embolism in this high-risk group is not significantly different from the general population.

Session: Poster

Program Number: P065

View Poster

« Return to SAGES 2010 abstract archive